iamoneagain
Headphoneus Supremus
So when I tried the EQ for the stock pads I prefer Zach’s stock sound. The bass has more oomph and the vocals are just right. The EQ doesn’t seem to add anything but make it’s slightly less warm and thinner sounding. I think the EQ may work better for the suede since that’s not how the Caldera was tuned, so might balance it out a bit. Next up, trying the thick pads with their EQ. I always felt mids were too recessed for my taste but liked the layer effect sometimes.So I just tried the setting for the Caldera Suede and to my surprise, I like it more than stock. It opens up the sound more with airier highs, clearer mids, and snappier bass while still keeping all the texture. It’s quite impressive. Location of instruments is very precise. It does all this while still keeping what I love about the suede pads, euphoric mids. I tested it on all the tracks the Expanse and Caldera stock pads with ASR EQ gave me trouble. They all passed and sounded better than stock suede. I still like stock sound but think I’m keeping this EQ for now.
Here’s that link:
https://github.com/jaakkopasanen/AutoEq/tree/master/results/Kuulokenurkka/over-ear/ZMF Caldera (suede earpads)
Edit: so I remembered not liking new Foo Fighters new album on suede pads as much as stock. So even with this EQ setting on suede, stock pads and stock sound is better. I haven’t loaded up the stock pads EQ settings to see how those sound. But it is interesting the EQ suede come closer to stock pads in the highs now. It’s just they still don’t hit as hard in the bass. Stock pads just hit harder with tighter bass.
Edit: got the thick pads EQd and it does bring up the mids but it’s almost too sharp. So after all this I find I prefer the stock pads with stock sound. And the EQ for suede is better than stock but would need extended listening to confirm. And thick with stock is too recessed in mids but too sharp with EQ. So thick pads are not for me.
Last edited: