I also ordered out of solidarityhttps://www.ebay.com/itm/265405072714?hash=item3dcb60054a:g:BVAAAOSwf7NhL8nv
Just ordered a pair. We'll see how these fares
Last edited:
I also ordered out of solidarityhttps://www.ebay.com/itm/265405072714?hash=item3dcb60054a:g:BVAAAOSwf7NhL8nv
Just ordered a pair. We'll see how these fares
There is plenty of raving about the RFT foil getters in the Schiit Mjolnir II threads !Glad to hear it. Like i mentioned above i went for the foil getters rather than matched pair in this instance. I'm excited to see what the hype is about, as i really was determined to stick with my E180CC tubes for the foreseeable future. I find them just about perfect tbh, so it'll take something special to dislodge them from the sockets permanently
If you can, order a pair of RFT ECC82. These are fantastic 12AU7s (especially the ‘foil getter’ version). I have been using these in a Rogue RH-5.
+1 on the RFTs. I’ve been saying this for years.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/265405072714?hash=item3dcb60054a:g:BVAAAOSwf7NhL8nv
Just ordered a pair. We'll see how these fares
There is plenty of raving about the RFT foil getters in the Schiit Mjolnir II threads !
The only consideration I've found is that in general the tube dealers match the best measuring tubes and sell the odd ends as singles. I've requested many times of sellers to test and provide only 100%+/100%+ tubes, "NOS"/"NIB" included. Anything less than New is Used - with who knows how many hours on the tube(s). Recently I got lucky with that Jan RCA 6AS7G "NIB", as he couldn't do more than Emission tests with his tester, fortunately it turned out to be a great tube.In this case; No. The reason for that was that a matched pair was simply unavailable with the foil getters, at least for a sane amount of money.
Also i have yet to have an audible issue regarding the matter (mached vs unmatched pair) tbh, meaning as long as the tubes are all good, of the same type and NIB+NOS i will not be able to hear anything out of sorts unless one ore both of the tubes are faulty.
If my equipment cost 10-20 times more i might care, but the differences in this case should be miniscule if any.
Good question, fortunately Xduoo shared the signal architecture:XDUOO TA-20: Is it fully balanced internally (i.e. between input and output) or does it only ‘feature’ balanced sockets? I cannot tell from the ‘xduoo.net’ description.
The AKG K712 Pro's should be well driven by the TA-26. Did you set your source at 100% drive?, and modulate the drive from your DAC into the TA-26?I had an interesting experience with my TA-26 (again). I hooked up my AKG K712 Pro's, which are quite nice on tube amps according to a lot of people. This resulted in an unfortunate experience. They basically sounded the same way as Sundaras on this amp; Flat, tinny, and bass-shy. And when turning up the volume there was quite audible distortion.
Now i have to say i didn't expect this, as the 712's are dynamic driver, 62 ohm headphones. And as such should be within the specs suited for this amp. That really sucked, i have to admit.
For now i am still stuck on my Atrox V2 for these cans, so maybe i should run the TA-26 as a pre for that to get some tube magic out of it (even though they sound excellent on the Atrox).
Anyways; anyone know if the pre out of the TA-26 is decoupled from the headphone jack out? Meaning; will the headphones have to be disconnected to use the pre out?
It is what I am going to work on in the next month or two, depending on headphone sales, an HD600 300 ohm and an HD650 300 ohm, both might sound even better than my HD660s 150 ohm, but IDK how, as this HD660S pairs so well with the TA-26 already.EDIT; BTW another question..I have in my budget for the next month to get either a Sennheiser HD 650 or a pair of HD 660S to use with the TA-26. Any experiences with any of these on the TA-26 out there?
I had an interesting experience with my TA-26 (again). I hooked up my AKG K712 Pro's, which are quite nice on tube amps according to a lot of people. This resulted in an unfortunate experience. They basically sounded the same way as Sundaras on this amp; Flat, tinny, and bass-shy. And when turning up the volume there was quite audible distortion.
Now i have to say i didn't expect this, as the 712's are dynamic driver, 62 ohm headphones. And as such should be within the specs suited for this amp. That really sucked, i have to admit.
For now i am still stuck on my Atrox V2 for these cans, so maybe i should run the TA-26 as a pre for that to get some tube magic out of it (even though they sound excellent on the Atrox).
Anyways; anyone know if the pre out of the TA-26 is decoupled from the headphone jack out? Meaning; will the headphones have to be disconnected to use the pre out?
EDIT; BTW another question..I have in my budget for the next month to get either a Sennheiser HD 650 or a pair of HD 660S to use with the TA-26. Any experiences with any of these on the TA-26 out there?
It might be the tube pairing currently, as I've had the same "muffled" sound reaction with some songs - resonating to the music, building up a "standing wave" which adds an unusual pressure in my ears - which interferes with the clear sound I usually hear.I sometimes use my HD660S with the TA-26 and I find the pairing very good even with the stock 6.35 cable. In very few cases, on some of the old songs in my library it sounds a little bit muffled, but for the rest no problem.
It might be the tube pairing currently, as I've had the same "muffled" sound reaction with some songs - resonating to the music, building up a "standing wave" which adds an unusual pressure in my ears - which interferes with the clear sound I usually hear.
So far only the JAN RCA 5692 has completely removed that "muffled" sound, very surprising actually. Even my "best" 6SN7GT VT-231 "Black Beauty" does it to a smaller degree, all of the VT-231's can produce that higher than normal "standing wave" pressure with some music.
I'm hoping to find other 6SN7 tubes that have less or none of that "resonance", so far the 6SN7GT has the most, 6SN7GTA has a bit less, and maybe the 6SN7GTB will improve the sound to the 5962 pristine clean sound level.
I think I'll try the 1953 Melz with the 1950 JAN RCA 6AS7G, and see if the Melz will do as well as the 5962 - or where it falls between the VT-231 and 5962
And, this might be a great example of what some call "lifting a veil" obscuring the sound, it was very apparent when I moved from the KEN-RAD JAN CKR 6SN7 GT VT-231 1944 LEGENDARY BLACK BEAUTY CHROMED FOIL to the JAN RCA 5692, the pressure was gone and the clarity was revealed.
I was trying to find a word to describe that high resonating high pressure feeling, and "muffled" is a good one, thanks!
What tubes are you listening with on the TA-26?At the moment, the IRL situation(work+personal life) does not allow me to spend my time studying and rolling tubes.
Hopefully, as we approach summer, I will have some spare time to get deeper into rolling tubes for TA-26. If I get the right combination or a specific tube that can fix the issue that seems to bother us a little, I'll post my finding here. Ultimately we are all about enjoying the music
If I remember correctly, I have a Tung Sol 6SN7 and a SED wing 6AS7G. It has been a while since I switched the default Chinese tubes.What tubes are you listening with on the TA-26?