WOO AUDIO COMPARISON THREAD
Dec 11, 2013 at 8:47 PM Post #151 of 196
Oh ok sorry for my wrongful conclusion.

Al D
 
Dec 11, 2013 at 10:06 PM Post #152 of 196
@SilentOne (or anyone)

1) There are 3 pinXLR outputs for headphones on the back?

2) What's the benefit of making wa5 a dual Monoblock as opposed to separate PSU construction? What are tre the downsides?

 
1. No. The WA5 mono blocks are speaker amps only, no Headphone Outputs. I'm modifying these to have L/R 4-pin XLR Headphone Outputs for full mono K1000 Output functionality. 
 
2. Pursuit. Though, simply splitting things up will likely add costs and nothing more. Mono blocks can provide the maker an opportunity to design a dedicated amp for a driver/speaker. Hopefully using better parts while in there, though that's not always the case. Also, monos make for shorter speaker runs. Some amps may/may not benefit from enhanced channel separation in mono config.
 
But this is a quick view from a speaker amp perspective. For headphones, doubtful. So, why do it? Pursuit. If there are ideals to be had, some people will chase. Despite lacking the ability to discern any differences.
 
Dec 12, 2013 at 7:07 AM Post #153 of 196
Ardilla.

My amp is not balanced , it has 3 sets of RCA inputs and speaker terminals all on the rear of the amp.

On the front it has a 1/4 stereo headphone jack and a 4 wire XlR . Label k2 k or something like that . The XlR is for hi power headphones. Like the HE6.

 
Yes, I knew the WA5 wasn't balanced
 
I was wondering about the WA5 monoblocks, if they have headphone connectors as well as speaker outbuts. The logical (since dual 3-pin XLR headphone cables are available) would then be to have speaker taps and an 3-pin XLR at the vack of the WA5 monoblock. 
 
I got the impression that there were XLR in and outs from SilentOne's answer here, http://www.head-fi.org/t/691974/woo-audio-comparison-thread/135#post_10057282
 
Dec 12, 2013 at 7:09 AM Post #154 of 196
   
1. No. The WA5 mono blocks are speaker amps only, no Headphone Outputs. I'm modifying these to have L/R 4-pin XLR Headphone Outputs for full mono K1000 Output functionality. 
 
2. Pursuit. Though, simply splitting things up will likely add costs and nothing more. Mono blocks can provide the maker an opportunity to design a dedicated amp for a driver/speaker. Hopefully using better parts while in there, though that's not always the case. Also, monos make for shorter speaker runs. Some amps may/may not benefit from enhanced channel separation in mono config.
 
But this is a quick view from a speaker amp perspective. For headphones, doubtful. So, why do it? Pursuit. If there are ideals to be had, some people will chase. Despite lacking the ability to discern any differences.

 
Since you loose something by having AC transformer in the same chassis, have you considered a mono-vlock with dual external PSU's?? WA5-Mono four chassis version? 
cool.gif

 
Dec 12, 2013 at 7:24 AM Post #155 of 196
i would like this clllarifed , i f need be i will email woo audio. i am just wondering and i am sure it sound great either way
 
Dec 12, 2013 at 9:14 AM Post #156 of 196
   
1. No. The WA5 mono blocks are speaker amps only, no Headphone Outputs. I'm modifying these to have L/R 4-pin XLR Headphone Outputs for full mono K1000 Output functionality. 
 
2. Pursuit. Though, simply splitting things up will likely add costs and nothing more. Mono blocks can provide the maker an opportunity to design a dedicated amp for a driver/speaker. Hopefully using better parts while in there, though that's not always the case. Also, monos make for shorter speaker runs. Some amps may/may not benefit from enhanced channel separation in mono config.
 
But this is a quick view from a speaker amp perspective. For headphones, doubtful. So, why do it? Pursuit. If there are ideals to be had, some people will chase. Despite lacking the ability to discern any differences.

SO, why using a 4 pin XLR in each monoblock? You are going to be using just 2 pins on each. You can even use 1 TRS female connection on each one and will probably be easier and cheaper.
 
Moon Audio Stay updated on Moon Audio at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
 
https://www.facebook.com/MoonAudio/ https://twitter.com/MoonAudio https://instagram.com/moonaudio https://www.moon-audio.com/ https://www.youtube.com/@moon-audio sales@moon-audio.com
Dec 12, 2013 at 9:56 AM Post #157 of 196
  SO, why using a 4 pin XLR in each monoblock? You are going to be using just 2 pins on each. You can even use 1 TRS female connection on each one and will probably be easier and cheaper.

 
I would be thinking a 3 pin XLR in each (even though you only need 2 pins on each) would be practical beacuse of the availability of cables with dual 3-pin XLRs
 
But I see Woo use TRS-adapters on the 234
 

 
Dec 12, 2013 at 2:19 PM Post #159 of 196
It can be done that way or using independent cables per side with mono TRS plug in each one to avoid the extra mechanical connection of the adapter.
 
Moon Audio Stay updated on Moon Audio at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
 
https://www.facebook.com/MoonAudio/ https://twitter.com/MoonAudio https://instagram.com/moonaudio https://www.moon-audio.com/ https://www.youtube.com/@moon-audio sales@moon-audio.com
Dec 12, 2013 at 3:43 PM Post #163 of 196
  SO, why using a 4 pin XLR in each monoblock? You are going to be using just 2 pins on each. You can even use 1 TRS female connection on each one and will probably be easier and cheaper.

 
This is only suggested and neither final or critical really. My Headphone cable terminates with male 4-pin XLR plug. Once cabling leaves split from female 4-pin XLR adapter to amps, those terminations are left to choice. My wording is for illustration purposes only. I'm even considering 5-way binding posts instead. With current Wireworld pigtails, I wouldn't have to add
wink_face.gif
any adapters or tips. 
 
Dec 12, 2013 at 4:22 PM Post #164 of 196
   
This is only suggested and neither final or critical really. My Headphone cable terminates with male 4-pin XLR plug. Once cabling leaves split from female 4-pin XLR adapter to amps, those terminations are left to choice. My wording is for illustration purposes only. I'm even considering 5-way binding posts instead. With current Wireworld pigtails, I wouldn't have to add
wink_face.gif
any adapters or tips. 

I always wondered what the 5th way is?
 
http://cdn.avsforum.com/1/14/14741a68_5-waybindingpost.jpeg
 
Dec 12, 2013 at 4:27 PM Post #165 of 196
 
Since you loose something by having AC transformer in the same chassis, have you considered a mono-vlock with dual external PSU's?? WA5-Mono four chassis version? 
cool.gif

 
Same chassis... split chassis... yes, pros and cons live for both. But each have their feet tied to the same fire of design - good or bad design and well or poor execution. For example, proper isolation? In your view, what's being lost? 
 
Have to admit, one night I thought I saw a four chassis version at the foot of the bed... I eventually fell back to sleep, though. 
normal_smile .gif
 
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top