First off, cajunchrist, I agree almost wholeheartedly -- except for the athletics part. I don't believe that sports is really self-expression -- where's the spontaneity of creation in sports? It's just a simple reaction to a set of simple rules and other players on the court who are following the rules.
Quote:
Originally posted by Dusty Chalk
Not bloody likely -- it's all been done. Every note's been played, most chords captured and identified.
It's not like there's a new species waiting to be discovered.
Oh, sure, you might find someone like Zia -- a combination I bet you haven't heard before, she writes most of her stuff in 10 and 13 tone scales.
But those are becoming harder and harder to find. Better to just give up. |
I'm not sure if I'm right (I'm no music historian) but that seems to be what people have been saying all along. Who in the 1920s or 1930s would have thought that someone like Miles Davis could revolutionize jazz to the extent that he did? Who could have seen the emergence of atonal "classical" music as an accepted medium for musical expression in the mid-nineteenth century?
I think there's lots of great new music being made. A little while ago I posted about a CD I had bought on a whim from amazon.fr by a Polish pianist, Bojan Zulfikarpasic, called
Solobsession. I wouldn't say it's genius, but I've really never heard a solo jazz piano album like it. Okay, my experience isn't so extensive, but all the time I see new recordings of the old greats, new jazz artists, and even some new composers.
As for rock and techno -- what do you expect? It's a pop culture that feeds off anti-pop-culture popular sentiment. You have ridiculously unoriginal and uncreative ear-bleeders everywhere. I wouldn't be looking for the next Beatles in this environment -- or Floyd, Zeppelin, or the Who for that matter. That's why I don't really listen to any modern pop recordings -- whether it's officially labeled "pop" or not. Stick with the classics!