Chu
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2001
- Posts
- 1,132
- Likes
- 26
Just some general comments.
1. You can patent a recipe. Companies generally prefer to keep it a trade secret though, because what the public gets in exchange for a limited monopoly is full disclosure. Recipes simply have too long of a lifespan to make this a good trade for most companies. Imagine how different coca-cola would be as a company if their recipe was not only fully known, but completly legal to duplicate!
2. AMD and Intel is a very interesting case study in patents and how IP works (and does not) in general. There is absolutely no denying that the competition between AMD and Intel has greatly benefited the consumer. You only have to look to the situation right before the Athlon hit -- Intel was the de facto leader in x86 microprocessors and used that position to slowly ramp up the P3 at very high margins. Enter the Athlon. The computer industry has never been the same.
What's interesting in looking at the competition between AMD and Intel though is that in many ways it's a case study on what the technology sector would look like without patents. The two companies signed a patent sharing agreement in the early 1980's that still holds today, and as a result they essentially have full rights to each other's IP. The pace of innovation certainly hasn't slowed down as a result, and anyone who makes this argument in general really needs to take a good hard look at AMD and Intel and figure out why their theory still holds.
I know this has very little to do with the OP but this thread has been slightly derailed since page 2
1. You can patent a recipe. Companies generally prefer to keep it a trade secret though, because what the public gets in exchange for a limited monopoly is full disclosure. Recipes simply have too long of a lifespan to make this a good trade for most companies. Imagine how different coca-cola would be as a company if their recipe was not only fully known, but completly legal to duplicate!
2. AMD and Intel is a very interesting case study in patents and how IP works (and does not) in general. There is absolutely no denying that the competition between AMD and Intel has greatly benefited the consumer. You only have to look to the situation right before the Athlon hit -- Intel was the de facto leader in x86 microprocessors and used that position to slowly ramp up the P3 at very high margins. Enter the Athlon. The computer industry has never been the same.
What's interesting in looking at the competition between AMD and Intel though is that in many ways it's a case study on what the technology sector would look like without patents. The two companies signed a patent sharing agreement in the early 1980's that still holds today, and as a result they essentially have full rights to each other's IP. The pace of innovation certainly hasn't slowed down as a result, and anyone who makes this argument in general really needs to take a good hard look at AMD and Intel and figure out why their theory still holds.
I know this has very little to do with the OP but this thread has been slightly derailed since page 2