darkarn
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2012
- Posts
- 1,329
- Likes
- 686
You know, 45 years ago there was a well oiled, thriving, audio market. The buyers were accustomed to the notion of audio as a hobby. This required the user to be (usually) self trained in the aspects of the audio. There were few experts as the users did not need them. The buyers of the gear made their own informed decisions based on their own increasing knowledge. This is when I started Theta Electronics with a tube preamp.
Back then, audio manufacturers did it because they loved audio. This is key. There was an attitude of mutual respect between fellow makers. There were sub-”religions” based upon many “Gods” such as electrostatic, horn, and small box speakers, tubes, solid state, etc, etc. Most makers and consumers of audio gear accepted the advantages of other designs and the attitude was that all of us were on a road to audio happiness.
In about the late 70s things began to change. High-end audio increasingly emerged. Top prices went from major kitchen appliance level to car level. A new class of high end audio retailers emerged for well heeled customers who could or would not acquire the knowledge to assemble their own systems. This was the beginning of audio divorced from love of music to conspicuous consumption. It became less relevant for the user, who became a “client”. It was no prerequisite to love the music to be an audiophile. Kinda like the Motor Trend subscriber who invite his buddies over to check out his $4000 tires.
On the product side, there has been a similar slide. As love of audio declined, a devolution toward quasi algorithmic design increased. Audio boxes called D/A converters sank into an indifference of their musical purpose. Delta sigma design emerged; these were documented such that designers of toasters or thermostats could crank out D/A converters. These are intended to fill a quasi algorithmic box at a certain price point that modern consumers will buy. Specialty musical products designed by those with an understanding of what and why they do was reduced to a toaster and thermostat mean.
The tragedy is that there are too many audio consumers who are buying audio based on experts or celebrity endorsement. They would rather spend hours on search engines to see what Joe Blow recommends than develop their own informed decisions. Sadder yet is that many users would rather have products endorsed by experts and celebrities over what they would pick on their own. Staggering that they not just request, but demand to be mentally led.
Schiit products are built because we love audio. Our market is those who also love music and are willing to learn enough about our hobby to make their own decisions. We respect our users, and express thanks to all of you have supported us along the years.
It feels like a sign of the times; right now is a time where people are a lot more time-starved and therefore prefer shortcuts to maximise their pleasure
I think another pertinent sign of the times is how people treat good audio; I recall that in the past (even before I am born in 1990!), music is something that you exclusively enjoy in a period of time. As in, "listening to music" = people need to set aside time just to listen to music. But right now, "listening to music" = something that should be done alongside other activities. Perhaps such commodification of music is why the audio manufacturers reacted in such a manner?