If EXT has technical ability of ie900 in terms of soundstage and imaging. I will have my doubts about its pricing...If it images as well or better than the IE 900, it'll be more than sufficient indeed, as I find the Senn to be all-round excellent (though not top of the hill, technically).
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Vision Ears and Rhines Custom Monitors (formerly Compact Monitors)
- Thread starter Mimouille
- Start date
-
- Tags
- earsonics vision ears
Sound Eq
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2013
- Posts
- 11,175
- Likes
- 2,834
can I ask, do you feel the phonix is similar to erlkonig quality level, or is the erlkonig a better iem in general, really curious how it compare to erlkonigImaging.. EXT is nothing special, definitely bottom of the pack when being compared to 12t and Phoenix then X to a lesser extent, but it is one of those IEMs that I really don't think you're going to care. The sound itself is just so addicting and oozes quality.
The Phonix on the other hand has very good imaging, TOTL level stuff.
Hence my question...If EXT has technical ability of ie900 in terms of soundstage and imaging. I will have my doubts about its pricing...
Sure! The Loki 8 wire and stormbreaker (1960) are slightly (but noticeably) more technical than the tri-copper but the way it images vocals and emphasises the natural timber of the already amazing capabilities of the EXT just makes me forget about the slight dip in detail retrieval / separation. It pulls vocals closer to you and makes them feel larger, I’m putting this down to a slight accentuation in the mids / upper mids, while also adding slightly more mid bass… mid bass slam and texture seems to be amplified on the Tri-copper (it’s probably the best mid bass texture I’ve heard on an IEM with this cable). I think tri-copper just makes EXT lean towards a more W shape signature which I really dig and makes it sound as though you’re listening in person. Both the 1960 and Loki make EXT sound more balanced and less exciting imo.May I please ask for your views on what the pairing synergy is with tri-copper? Maybe I can get this during PlusSound’s xmas discount
Last edited:
I don’t find EXT’s imaging lacking at all going back and forth between Odin. It obviously isn’t as razor sharp and separated as Odins but it has a natural fuzz to it which sounds ‘right’ while not feeling hyper defined. Left to right stereo separation is very good imo.Nothing special...are two words you don't want to hear about a TOTL flagship IEM...especially when it comes to something as critical (and supposedly straightforward, at this level) as imaging.
Thanks, I would always prefer natural to razor sharp/digital.I don’t find EXT’s imaging lacking at all going back and forth between Odin. It obviously isn’t as razor sharp and separated as Odins but it has a natural fuzz to it which sounds ‘right’ while not feeling hyper defined. Left to right stereo separation is very good imo.
Has anyone tried any of the Eletech cables with the EXT? Would love to hear your thoughts.
I had a feeling that Plato might actually make an interesting combo with the EXT (based on my experience of pairing Solaris 2020 with Plato 4-w)
Apologies if this has already been posted about; I've been out of the loop for a while due to being unwell, so am catching up on a tonne of posts on multiple threads!
I had a feeling that Plato might actually make an interesting combo with the EXT (based on my experience of pairing Solaris 2020 with Plato 4-w)
Apologies if this has already been posted about; I've been out of the loop for a while due to being unwell, so am catching up on a tonne of posts on multiple threads!
Not side by side … 12t bass is much more present and I’d say upper treble has more air within the signature, other than that Phonix is in a class of its own.Did you compare u12t and Phoenix?
Nothing special...are two words you don't want to hear about a TOTL flagship IEM...especially when it comes to something as critical (and supposedly straightforward, at this level) as imaging.
Idk, I just find the overall placement of stuff quite flat. Im guessing im hearing it this way due to the pulled back mid range. I don’t have an issue placing stuff within the stage but I just don’t find it anything special either for a $2900 monitor? I guess that’s a better way to word it.I’d say that EXT’s imaging is still very much in the realm of TOTL quality. I guess @aaf evo probably has higher than average standards because he’s used to the absolute best-in-class imaging IEM’s but for us mere mortals, I would say EXT imaging performance is still excellent and would be more than sufficient.
can I ask, do you feel the phonix is similar to erlkonig quality level, or is the erlkonig a better iem in general, really curious how it compare to erlkonig
Phonix to me surpasses Erlkonig on a quality standpoint. It is probably the most refined sound I have heard from an IEM. If you have an Erlkonig do you need to sell it and get a Phonix? Not sure about that… but, I do think the Phonix is has taken the overall Erlkonig DNA and polished it to a new level.
Phonix to me surpasses Erlkonig on a quality standpoint. It is probably the most refined sound I have heard from an IEM. If you have an Erlkonig do you need to sell it and get a Phonix? Not sure about that… but, I do think the Phonix is has taken the overall Erlkonig DNA and polished it to a new level.
crap
I'd like to see someone who still has the Erlky do a comparison with the Phoenix. And then I may still hold on to the Erlky. It is the entire package, not only the sound, that is appealing to me.crap
I'd like to see someone who still has the Erlky do a comparison with the Phoenix. And then I may still hold on to the Erlky. It is the entire package, not only the sound, that is appealing to me.
@SLC1966 I’m sure will go more in depth.
You are right, Erlkonig is such a good IEM in what it brings overall, the tuning switches and build coupled with it’s still top sound makes it hard to part with.
GiullianSN
Headphoneus Supremus
I think the VE Erlk LE is one of the most real premium and complete package ever launched. Sound, versatility, design, build quality, materials, accessories…I'd like to see someone who still has the Erlky do a comparison with the Phoenix. And then I may still hold on to the Erlky. It is the entire package, not only the sound, that is appealing to me.
I find the imaging on EXT outstanding. If I use a basic source such as a dongle of some sort then yes the imaging reduces. Top quality IEMs source up well and then when sourced down the difference is heard. "Mid-Fi" IEMS sound fine with a basic source and then do not source up well as the source gets better. They just stay the same IMHO.Not side by side … 12t bass is much more present and I’d say upper treble has more air within the signature, other than that Phonix is in a class of its own.
Idk, I just find the overall placement of stuff quite flat. Im guessing im hearing it this way due to the pulled back mid range. I don’t have an issue placing stuff within the stage but I just don’t find it anything special either for a $2900 monitor? I guess that’s a better way to word it.
Phonix to me surpasses Erlkonig on a quality standpoint. It is probably the most refined sound I have heard from an IEM. If you have an Erlkonig do you need to sell it and get a Phonix? Not sure about that… but, I do think the Phonix is has taken the overall Erlkonig DNA and polished it to a new level.
toaster
Headphoneus Supremus
Totally.I'd like to see someone who still has the Erlky do a comparison with the Phoenix. And then I may still hold on to the Erlky. It is the entire package, not only the sound, that is appealing to me.
I’m pumped to hear phonix (and ext,) but the overall build, packaging, and rarity of erlky undoubtedly contributes to what makes it special.
The erlky also remains one of the two best iems I’ve heard to date, with the orphy recently unlocking quite a bit of potential I never even knew the erlky had in it.
VE Hype!
I did an Erlk and Phonix direct A/B comparison a couple pages back. The two of them share the same DNA but they are IMHO really different IEMs. Both amazing IEMs. Phonix has the detail going on and still has engagement and is musical i.e. not too clinical. Erlk has the warmth and engagement at the forefront and still has the detail happening. I was hoping I would want to sell one of them. They really do co-exist well. Not good for the billfold.I'd like to see someone who still has the Erlky do a comparison with the Phoenix. And then I may still hold on to the Erlky. It is the entire package, not only the sound, that is appealing to me.
Last edited:
Users who are viewing this thread
Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)