At which point am I wrong with saying KA3 is a 2 Vrms dongle? FiiO own specifications clearly indicated it is 2 Vrms and up to 2.7 Vrms on BAL:
https://www.fiio.com/ka3_parameters
Yes it can go up to 2.7 Vrms and that is still a region of 2 no?
And have you checked Tempotec E44 specifications? clearly it is a 4 Vrms device which makes is double the powerful than KA3 even on paper
And just because in my summary I said KA3 is a weak 2 Vrms dongle and not specifically mention 2.7 Vrms, now the the accuracy is questionable?
Don't take my words for it, your opinion seems already set on what you want to believe, get yourself an actual E44 and KA3 side by side and compare, while at it get also Questyle M12 and Ovidius B1 - both of which prime examples of 2 Vrms dongles, test them, and see if you are hearing which ones has the better drive for magnetic planars, we can discuss all day long on assumptions and theories but nothing beats the actual experience.
It is not my interest to convince anyone, that is not why I am doing this. I did what I did because it is fun.