roy_jones
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- May 29, 2005
- Posts
- 962
- Likes
- 55
Quote:
Quit lying? That's exactly what I see in the frequency chart posted by 1964 ears so how the hell am I lying? I can understand that you have an undying love for the 1964-Q so your opinion is understandable but to call me a liar off of what I see from a chart posted from their own company is a bit much. I think it's great that you love your product but there's no need to get defensive and resort to calling me names. Also just so you know, I was very interested in the 1964-Q's but after seeing the frequency chart and hearing impressions on the smooth highs I'm moving onto something else.
Actually I'll just go out and say that I'm not satisfied with the highs on my ie8's which are supposedly less recessed than the 1964-Q's based off the frequency charts on headroom. Is the next post gonna be from someone so emotionally attached to his sennheiser ie8's that he's gonna call me a liar too? Like I said, I understand your love for your iem's but seriously man you need to calm down with that stuff. Keep in mind I do realize frequency charts aren't everything so I made sure to confirm opinions with people who own it and that have heard similar headphones and share the same musical taste.
Anyways besides ericp's unnecessary name calling I hope this thread can get back on track. I'm definitely looking forward to reading everyone's honest impressions.
I don't know if you were around when that Voltage/Sonic guy was still posting, but you've got to understand that there are posters here that are really proud of their purchases and derive a lot of their self-esteem from consumer products. You've simply got to accept that, for some members, their favorite IEM is kind of like a favorite sports team and a projection of their own ego. There's nothing wrong with that, and guys like ericp shouldn't be criticized for being so sensitive once you realize how important this is for them...