So
@H20Fidelity sent me the T1 to compare with mine and see if it really does sound different. On first listen I instantly thought it did, but continued listening had me thinking that my first impression was a placebo effect and I was just hearing what I expected to hear. I now understand why it's been so difficult for people to decide if this amp is "normal" or not.
Upon extended listening I can confirm some very subtle differences between my T1 and H20's T1. The differences are in the upper minds and lower treble I think and would only be a matter of a few dB (going only by ear). The result is a very slightly veiled and closed-in presentation from H20's T1. It's just enough to kill the space and detail that the T1 is so good at creating despite its slight warmth. I can't stress how subtle the difference is - even A/Bing it's still tricky to put a finger on the issue. All I can confirm is that H20's T1 somehow just lacks a little bit of magic (that's a technical term
).
I asked H20's permission to open the T1 and compare with mine and found what might be the culprit. Interestingly, the serial numbers are only 7 units apart with my unit coming after H20's.
Loquah's T1 - notice the 2 tiny resistors (I think) nearest the battery - they're labelled 1001:
Here's H20's - notice the same components, this time labelled 102:
There's no other difference I can see so I have to assume that these components are the key to the difference in the sound. The only other possibility is that the op amps (which are not identifiable) are different, but there's no way for me to tell.
What would be great now would be for someone who has a "good sounding" T1 to open there's up and check those components to see if they're the 102 or the 1001 variety.
In the meantime, I might contact Gavin for his comments on the matter...