The Watercooler -- Impressions, philosophical discussion and general banter. Index on first page. All welcome.
Dec 29, 2022 at 10:26 AM Post #44,596 of 88,418
Loudspeakers have to move much more air.
Still the problem to solve is similar, and why we have multi driver IEMs. What I always wonder about is why Over Ear Headphones have not explored multi drivers.
Thanks. Yes, was wondering that, too. Why no headphones with multiple drivers?
 
Dec 29, 2022 at 10:30 AM Post #44,597 of 88,418
Last edited:
Dec 29, 2022 at 10:43 AM Post #44,598 of 88,418
For sharts and giggles, and in the interests of science and community I invite everyone to take this test and share their results:

https://www.16personalities.com/personality-types#analysts
I think this was your best poll 🙃 Although your questions are getting deeper and deeper, to the point that I think it's time to leave the thread!

But as always with tests like these: Is this truly how we are, or how we would like to be?

drftr
 
Dec 29, 2022 at 10:44 AM Post #44,599 of 88,418
Loudspeakers have to move much more air.
Still the problem to solve is similar, and why we have multi driver IEMs. What I always wonder about is why Over Ear Headphones have not explored multi drivers.
Multi drivers headphones exist in a form of gaming headphones actually. There are a good amount of 7.1 headphones out there. And all of them just isn't very good partly because of the small drivers.

I think for headphones with drivers being this big and close, you will just end up with the drivers not lining up with your ears and you will have to deal with the sound bouncing off your ears, affecting the tuning and timing. It's good enough for gaming headphones, but bad for totl open backs.

A proper implementation with big drivers is going to be very massive and heavy. With higher complexity driving up the cost on top.
 
Last edited:
Dec 29, 2022 at 10:46 AM Post #44,600 of 88,418
For sharts and giggles, and in the interests of science and community I invite everyone to take this test and share their results:

https://www.16personalities.com/personality-types#analysts

Screenshot 2022-12-29 at 10.46.08 AM.png
 
Dec 29, 2022 at 11:02 AM Post #44,602 of 88,418
Dec 29, 2022 at 11:09 AM Post #44,604 of 88,418
Makes me think: Hey @Auricon, did you choose tuning over technicals in the last poll?

drftr

Can't recall, LOL, but most likely tuning despite having a highly technical career background.
 
Dec 29, 2022 at 11:22 AM Post #44,605 of 88,418
Can't recall, LOL, but most likely tuning despite having a highly technical career background.

Case in point, listened to @aaf evo's "Island" test track on EVO + Genesis. I was optimistic that Genesis has some redeeming technical chops but with EVO, the pairing (tuning?) was 🤮🤮🤮

Swapped out Genesis for P8 Prudence, Socrates, PW FT/(S) and all was right again.
 
Dec 29, 2022 at 11:28 AM Post #44,606 of 88,418
Dec 29, 2022 at 11:49 AM Post #44,607 of 88,418
Personality type: Advocate (INFJ-T)
Traits: Introverted – 87%, Intuitive – 76%, Feeling – 53%, Judging – 96%, Turbulent – 72%
Role: Diplomat
Strategy: Constant Improvement

Not sure why this thing thinks I'm introverted. What, just because I bond with strangers over the internet about putting in earphones and shutting out the world and ohokaymaybethatswhythatactuallymakesalotofsense
 
Last edited:
Dec 29, 2022 at 11:58 AM Post #44,608 of 88,418

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top