thelostMIDrange
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2011
- Posts
- 1,281
- Likes
- 120
that's a valid response............. maybe it can't be put into words....
but if someone forced you at gunpoint to express what those differences are in terms of classes, what would you say? Meaning, as a group, there must be at least one or two things that ALL planars have that ALL dynamics don't and vice versa. This must be true, since the two technologies are vastly different. Remember, you are at gunpoint, you must come up with something as a response or else! what would those differences be as subtle as they may be....
^^ I now own the MD's and have only auditioned the Paradox about a year ago. But to me, the Paradox was wonderfully neutral while the MD with dogpadz has more bass presence. If you are asking if you can add the dogpadz to the Paradox, the answer is sure but you wouldn't want to. The hp's are tuned and tested to work in a specific way to get the hallmark signature that are designed for. Changing the pads would greatly screw those results.
Thanks. Well, seriously considering getting one of these mods, probably the MDs. I do like my bass, but for reference can wouldn't want toooo much. Just want the extension + quality. I think they'd be a great closed complimentary can to he400. Would you agree?
I'll probably sell my pro900 to fund eventually. Sad, as they're fun, but they're a one trick pony and the piercing highs get on my nerves even though I only use them occasionally / at work
This is exactly the reason that I own both. I have bought many hp's to get a wonderfully matched pair of complementary hp's and these compliment very well. The MD does not have exaggerated bass. It's just warmer than neutral but with nice texture and impact. It doesn't bleed into the rest of the signature, nor does it artificially add bass when the material doesn't call for it.
gL!!
they are effortless you're right. That's what I meant by stable, motionless. The sound just comes from such a solid place. It's not a criticism, just an observation....that jaco link is a good example though of the difference, in bass at least. A good dynamic driver gives me a little more of jaco's personal bass tone (old alder fender jazz bass - which I also owned at one point so I know how it sounds) and the planars ive heard would not quite give me those details, although it would do just about every other aspect of reproducing low end better....I also see your point about colored planars and lifeless dynamics. I guess I was referring to good examples of each technology.,,,,, There can be no denying that planars are a little 'better' for electronic based music though or won't you even 'go there' and make that statement....
we'll have to agree to disagree on the Timing though. I don't feel planars get that as right compared to dynamic. Again, a broad blanket statement I know but just my general experience. The dynamics tend to breathe a little more naturally whereas planars seem a touch more regimented in timing. Very subtle differences though
I would just sh_t my pants...
I had a response to your response, but I forgot to post it last evening. Remember, if you are out hiking in the woods with a friend, and you encounter a black bear; you don't need to out-run the bear, but you just need to out-run the person that is with you.
OK, sorry to divert from the topic at hand.