Foam tips are best for U18t. Silicon tips matching causes a smaller stage and somewhat excessive treble. Comply tips are better than bundle foam tips, and I ordered crystal foam tips to find a better matching.
Usually I dont like foam tips with other iems(Zeus xra, Andromeda, se846 etc..), but u18t is different. Nice clarity with appropriate amount of bass. Silicon tips matching is too sibilant and has a excessive treble to me.
Ok, thanks for sharing. I suppose there isn't much difference between the two. I already have A18=U18 so I am seriously considering Forte. I wish I have full story on this expensive iem.
So is the entire lineup from bottom to the top getting a Tia revamp for the new year? That's the only plausible reason I can think of for all the U-series being wiped off the site.
Also, for any of you on the fence about the A-series upgrade program (which is ending soon) I would highly recommend it. The whole apex tech really does wonders for soundstage and listening fatigue. I've been holding out on a full-blown review of my A8s until I get my Trios to do even more comparisons.
First two pictures are of the left earpiece (the deep one) and the third is the right one. Concerning after a week of ownership and considering i treat them so delicately. I keep them in their case with the stock tips on at all times so there would have been no possibility of impact to the nozzle.
First two pictures are of the left earpiece (the deep one) and the third is the right one. Concerning after a week of ownership and considering i treat them so delicately. I keep them in their case with the stock tips on at all times so there would have been no possibility of impact to the nozzle.
I've been using mine pretty regularly for the last few months on my daily commute, and no issue with damage to the stems at all. I do look after my gear and transport it in a carry case (not the 64 Audio one), but I'd hardly day I wrap them in cotton wool.
May be worth reaching out to 64 Audio customer service after they Christmas shutdown and seeing what they say - pretty sure this isn't normal or expected, especially not in this price bracket.
First two pictures are of the left earpiece (the deep one) and the third is the right one. Concerning after a week of ownership and considering i treat them so delicately. I keep them in their case with the stock tips on at all times so there would have been no possibility of impact to the nozzle.
Definitely looks like an issue with the 3D printing process. Materials tend to have poorer tensile and shear strength compared to your run-of-the-mill injection-molded parts, especially when the surfaces at the stem aren't smoothed as your photos show and cracks can propagate easily. Certainly good justification for the new universals all having CNC milled aluminum shells. Get in touch with their support team, I've had nothing but good experiences with them and they certainly take care of their customers!
I think a very interesting cable to consider is the MS x Effect Audio 'Eos'. It's a modifed version of Ares II with a musically neutral sound. One of my personal favorites at the monent, costs $220.
Definitely looks like an issue with the 3D printing process. Materials tend to have poorer tensile and shear strength compared to your run-of-the-mill injection-molded parts, especially when the surfaces at the stem aren't smoothed as your photos show and cracks can propagate easily. Certainly good justification for the new universals all having CNC milled aluminum shells. Get in touch with their support team, I've had nothing but good experiences with them and they certainly take care of their customers!
Thanks, my first thought was the 3D printing process. As i understand the plastic is deposited in layers so i can imagine if these layers aren't properly bonded to one another this could cause weakneses to form, and with the stems being the thinnest point i can see how these weak areas can break off easily.
I don't wish to deter anyone from making a purchase as i've heard nothing but good things about 64 Audio, and as you said their new CNC shells will prevent this from happening which is good news.
I will reach out to them and see what solution they can offer.
Thanks, my first thought was the 3D printing process. As i understand the plastic is deposited in layers so i can imagine if these layers aren't properly bonded to one another this could cause weakneses to form, and with the stems being the thinnest point i can see how these weak areas can break off easily.
I don't wish to deter anyone from making a purchase as i've heard nothing but good things about 64 Audio, and as you said their new CNC shells will prevent this from happening which is good news.
I will reach out to them and see what solution they can offer.
I agree. That does not look good. You should certainly find out if they're willing to send you another. They probably will, as that looks like a true defect in build quality. They are not supposed to chip away that easy.
Ok, thanks for sharing. I suppose there isn't much difference between the two. I already have A18=U18 so I am seriously considering Forte. I wish I have full story on this expensive iem.
I think u18t only can show its full potential with foam tips. I was told that Lear company's foam tips also good. I will post impressions after I get the tips.
I think a very interesting cable to consider is the MS x Effect Audio 'Eos'. It's a modifed version of Ares II with a musically neutral sound. One of my personal favorites at the monent, costs $220.
Thank you for the recommendation! I just checked their website and looks like the 3.5mm balanced connector is not a stock option. Will reach out to see if that's doable.
I think a very interesting cable to consider is the MS x Effect Audio 'Eos'. It's a modifed version of Ares II with a musically neutral sound. One of my personal favorites at the monent, costs $220.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.