grawk
Itinerant Miscreant
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2005
- Posts
- 8,739
- Likes
- 36
I don't judge sound with my wallet, and I'm not a huge fan of RS1s.
Originally Posted by grawk /img/forum/go_quote.gif I can say that to my preference, the HF2 is clearly better in every way than the RS1. |
Originally Posted by DoYouRight /img/forum/go_quote.gif everyday is painful its been over 2 weeks since I ordered and I am not used to waiting more than 5 days max and it's really hard, when is he going to charge credit cards? |
Originally Posted by ChiComm4 /img/forum/go_quote.gif It's quite interesting that the HF-2 has been compared a couple times (rather favorably) to the HD650. Might anyone comment on this? Much appreciated. |
Originally Posted by subtle /img/forum/go_quote.gif That's odd our perception is so different, because getting flats for increased bass response was the main reason I felt others, including myself, would go with flats. I find, for my ears at least, that this is exactly what they do, along with collapsing the already small soundstage. I also find that we disagree on the bowls perspective as well. They indeed make the presentation more balanced for me on most of the John Grado models. I prefer flats with the RS-1, however I definitely prefer bowls on both the PS-1 and HF-1. The Joe Grado HP-1000 is another animal entirely and doesn't fit in to the same criteria. I prefer them with flats. |
Originally Posted by Canman /img/forum/go_quote.gif To me, flats sound muddy and closed in. The muddy bass response with flats is the reason I prefer bowls on all Grados including HP-1000 |
Originally Posted by UglyJoe /img/forum/go_quote.gif I'm interested in this as well. Larry, you have any comment for this question? |