- Joined
- Aug 18, 2007
- Posts
- 17,452
- Likes
- 839
Quote:
I did not find the Triple.fi mids laid back, that would be the Super.fi, while the triples had a nicer more forward but not excessively so mids. I still chose the Livewires over the Triple.fi as they sounded as good to me, and fit better.
Originally Posted by PeterDLai /img/forum/go_quote.gif This is an interesting observation. It seems like the SuperFreQ should sound pretty different from the Triple.fi 10 Pro despite being second in sound quality. I feel like I've read here that the UE Triple.fi 10 Pro has a laid back midrange, and the SuperFreQ has a forward midrange? I guess it all depends on the listener. I still want to give the UE Triple.fi 10 Pro a listen someday, even if they often cause comfort or fit problems. It sounds more and more like what I want from an IEM. Would you say that the LiveWires are still more balanced than the SuperFreQ (because of the aggressive midrange of the SuperFreQ) or is that not the case? |
I did not find the Triple.fi mids laid back, that would be the Super.fi, while the triples had a nicer more forward but not excessively so mids. I still chose the Livewires over the Triple.fi as they sounded as good to me, and fit better.