I do NOT understand...
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
The first balanced ultra-portable headphone amp in the world....
- Home
- Forums
- Forums
- Sponsored Threads and Group Buys (Archive)
- Member of the Trade Sponsored Threads Forum
- Member of the Trade Sponsored Threads Forum ARCHIVE
- Thread starter Ray Samuels
- Start date
nc8000
Headphoneus Supremus
If constructed to do so a balanced amp can generate a balanced signal from a single ended signal (my desktop RudiStor RPX-100 has 2 sets og singled ended inputs and 1 set of balanced inputs) all of them going out as balanced if using the balanced outputs. So a balanced source is not required.
I'm all for balancing in my home rig so will follow this thread closely.
I'm all for balancing in my home rig so will follow this thread closely.
Quote:
yea but to maximize its performance, a balanced source is a "must". what is a balanced portable source?
Originally Posted by nc8000 /img/forum/go_quote.gif If constructed to do so a balanced amp can generate a balanced signal from a single ended signal (my desktop RudiStor RPX-100 has 2 sets og singled ended inputs and 1 set of balanced inputs) all of them going out as balanced if using the balanced outputs. So a balanced source is not required. I'm all for balancing in my home rig so will follow this thread closely. |
yea but to maximize its performance, a balanced source is a "must". what is a balanced portable source?
Jarmel
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2008
- Posts
- 261
- Likes
- 32
Sounds absolutely amazing in concept but as other people have mentioned, it seems a balanced source might be necessary.
Steve Eddy
Member of the Trade: The Audio Guild
Aka: TempAccount555
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2003
- Posts
- 6,609
- Likes
- 554
Quote:
What are you wanting the balanced source to do?
Are you wanting the balanced source for driving a balanced, differential input for the purpose of common-mode noise rejection? Or are you wanting it as a convenient means of providing an inverted signal to drive the inputs of a pair of bridged amplifier channels?
se
Originally Posted by fhuang /img/forum/go_quote.gif yea but to maximize its performance, a balanced source is a "must". what is a balanced portable source? |
What are you wanting the balanced source to do?
Are you wanting the balanced source for driving a balanced, differential input for the purpose of common-mode noise rejection? Or are you wanting it as a convenient means of providing an inverted signal to drive the inputs of a pair of bridged amplifier channels?
se
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2008
- Posts
- 2,733
- Likes
- 420
Quote:
A bit confused here, but what does this even mean?
Originally Posted by jamato8 /img/forum/go_quote.gif Anyway, the size of this one fits into the current high caliber of IEM's very well it would seem. |
A bit confused here, but what does this even mean?
jamato8
Headphoneus Supremus
Quote:
The other portable is for Stax, electrostatic (the first used C cells and would have weighed quite a bit, agreed? and the second Stax portable for electrostatic ear buds). That is a bit different from a balanced portable that can be used with any number of IEM's adapted for that purpose with the right termination or even PortaPros, which I have listened to and have in balanced, or other non demanding phones. In other words it is a versatile portable balanced amp for a completely different type of driver.
By size I also refer to having a very small balanced amp that can easily fit into a pocket and which is more in proportion with the ultra portability of IEM's vs headphones.
Originally Posted by n3rdling /img/forum/go_quote.gif A bit confused here, but what does this even mean? |
The other portable is for Stax, electrostatic (the first used C cells and would have weighed quite a bit, agreed? and the second Stax portable for electrostatic ear buds). That is a bit different from a balanced portable that can be used with any number of IEM's adapted for that purpose with the right termination or even PortaPros, which I have listened to and have in balanced, or other non demanding phones. In other words it is a versatile portable balanced amp for a completely different type of driver.
By size I also refer to having a very small balanced amp that can easily fit into a pocket and which is more in proportion with the ultra portability of IEM's vs headphones.
Ray Samuels
Member of the Trade: Ray Samuels Audio
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2003
- Posts
- 1,237
- Likes
- 30
Quote:
No it does not. It takes the single ended signal & split the phase to two signals equal to each others but out of phase 180 degree. One is positive & the other is negative.
Ray Samuels
Originally Posted by scootermafia /img/forum/go_quote.gif Does this thing need a balanced source? |
No it does not. It takes the single ended signal & split the phase to two signals equal to each others but out of phase 180 degree. One is positive & the other is negative.
Ray Samuels
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2008
- Posts
- 1,199
- Likes
- 377
since the amp has both a balanced output and a single ended output ( the 4 pin xlr and the 3.5mm stereo) how will the sound differ between the 2?
cmascatello
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2003
- Posts
- 875
- Likes
- 10
Very interesting...
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2007
- Posts
- 17,452
- Likes
- 839
I have heard balanced amps that do an excellent job splitting a single ended input into a balanced signal, including the RSA A-10 - where I could not distinguish when I was listing to the Meridian CDP via single ended signal and when I was listening to the balanced signal. The soundstage and separation was equally as good with either signal. I was able to hear the difference between the tubes in the SE circuit vs the balanced circuit, as they were different brands and sounded slightly different in tone (SE tube was an Amperex that was slightly more rolled off than the ones in the balanced circuit).
My SP Square Wave XL also does a great job converting SE sources to balanced, and there are others that use phase splitters or input transformers to accept an SE source and convert it to balanced. So, a balanced source is not mandatory.
My SP Square Wave XL also does a great job converting SE sources to balanced, and there are others that use phase splitters or input transformers to accept an SE source and convert it to balanced. So, a balanced source is not mandatory.
Beefy
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2008
- Posts
- 2,709
- Likes
- 281
Quote:
The question is, are the benefits of going balanced worth it compared to the costs. It seems that this amp does not have the new/superior digital volume control that so many are thrilled with in other new portable amps....... net gain is........?
Originally Posted by HeadphoneAddict /img/forum/go_quote.gif I have heard balanced amps that do an excellent job splitting a single ended input into a balanced signal... |
The question is, are the benefits of going balanced worth it compared to the costs. It seems that this amp does not have the new/superior digital volume control that so many are thrilled with in other new portable amps....... net gain is........?
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2008
- Posts
- 1,199
- Likes
- 377
Quote:
only one way to find out, by trying out the amp for yourself! hopefully, we'll get to do that at canjam 2010, if the final product is not completed by then.
Originally Posted by Beefy /img/forum/go_quote.gif The question is, are the benefits of going balanced worth it compared to the costs. It seems that this amp does not have the new/superior digital volume control that so many are thrilled with in other new portable amps....... net gain is........? |
only one way to find out, by trying out the amp for yourself! hopefully, we'll get to do that at canjam 2010, if the final product is not completed by then.
T.IIZUKA
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- May 23, 2009
- Posts
- 3,038
- Likes
- 10
I want standardizing the connector of the mini- balance terminal.
This terminal is "E4-191" Series.
http://www.technical-e.co.jp/pdf/parts/micro_4.pdf
The schedule which designates this as de facto standard?
This terminal is "E4-191" Series.
http://www.technical-e.co.jp/pdf/parts/micro_4.pdf
The schedule which designates this as de facto standard?
ety0820
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2009
- Posts
- 30
- Likes
- 11
OH~~~That`s goood news!
but i have question.Can single end cable transformed to balanced cable by using
adapter??
but i have question.Can single end cable transformed to balanced cable by using
adapter??
Users who are viewing this thread
Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
- Home
- Forums
- Forums
- Sponsored Threads and Group Buys (Archive)
- Member of the Trade Sponsored Threads Forum
- Member of the Trade Sponsored Threads Forum ARCHIVE