majo123
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2016
- Posts
- 6,440
- Likes
- 12,084
"shoot the sh!t" thread
Lol
"shoot the sh!t" thread
What a surreal surprise!!! Welcome back! We're all glad to get back the dude that was missing, especially in our new "shoot the sh!t" thread
There are rumors out there that you use a modified Nokia 3210 for a source, others say they've seen you harmonically chant over a precision assembled pile of sticks that accepts a 3.5 jack, but what do you really use on a daily basis as a DAP?
Also, stupid engineering question. I had a few hearing tests done where you press the button for the test tones that you hear. What can I do with this data to match up the frequency response of and IEM better with my hearing? I'm assuming I can't do a short time fourier transform for the test tones because the testing didn't collect enough data, but if I graph the dB levels of each test tone how can I correlate them to the frequency response curve of an IEM? If you know on top of your head maybe or have some PDFs or academic journals you can send my way
Got to enjoy what you do , and I posted before about taking pride in your achievements/products ...couldnt have been easy.
But hey new products new adventure, looking forward to seeing the products .
At least this time around you've got the impedance and sensitivity numbers. That's something to go on at the very least. I didn't even bother registering that frequency response because I don't care; if it includes the standard 20-20kHz, then I couldn't care less since that's the range of human hearing anyway. Sure you might get slight "feel" from frequencies outside of that range, but impact is negligible so to me, it doesn't matter.Agree 100%. IMHO: Would really like to see some specifications. Like : Impedance, Efficiency, Distortion?, Weight, Dimensions, Material of construction, Exact Connector type, Cable Type, Tip Diameter, etc.. Maybe even an audio output curve ?
Only Qualitative descriptions don't do much for me; unless it's actual listening reviews of samples from folks who have listened to a bunch of IEMs/Headphones.
For example: 14-40,000 Hz could be at +/- 50db ... Which might a high percentage of IEMs? So it actually says nothing to me.
BUT, this time it doesn't cost any money to pre-order. I'm more willing to do that since it's not gonna cost me anything. If something comes of it, great, if not, well I didn't lose anything.Bad Bobby, bad! You said the bad words Bob, "pre-order" and "next week". Instant flash backs. I'll have to think on whether or not I can deal with that.
I don't feel like the P2 is positioned as a successor to the P1. The naming scheme strikes me as saying the larger the number, the lower the tier. So it's the same sort of sound signature the P1 was known for, but maybe a bit less refined. You can also see that the material quality won't be as nice either. I'm guessing if you want the top-end of MEE Audio, it's still going to be P1 for the more clarity/detail/brighter sound signature and the M7 Pro for a more darker theme.So the P2, presumably an upgrade from the P1, would cost half as much?
I don't feel like the P2 is positioned as a successor to the P1
At least this time around you've got the impedance and sensitivity numbers. That's something to go on at the very least. I didn't even bother registering that frequency response because I don't care; if it includes the standard 20-20kHz, then I couldn't care less since that's the range of human hearing anyway. Sure you might get slight "feel" from frequencies outside of that range, but impact is negligible so to me, it doesn't matter.
BUT, this time it doesn't cost any money to pre-order. I'm more willing to do that since it's not gonna cost me anything. If something comes of it, great, if not, well I didn't lose anything.
I don't feel like the P2 is positioned as a successor to the P1. The naming scheme strikes me as saying the larger the number, the lower the tier. So it's the same sort of sound signature the P1 was known for, but maybe a bit less refined. You can also see that the material quality won't be as nice either. I'm guessing if you want the top-end of MEE Audio, it's still going to be P1 for the more clarity/detail/brighter sound signature and the M7 Pro for a more darker theme.
At least this time around you've got the impedance and sensitivity numbers. That's something to go on at the very least. I didn't even bother registering that frequency response because I don't care; if it includes the standard 20-20kHz, then I couldn't care less since that's the range of human hearing anyway. Sure you might get slight "feel" from frequencies outside of that range, but impact is negligible so to me, it doesn't matter.
Pray and pay! lol jk jkInteresting, Where did you see the Impedance and Sensitivity ? Must have missed that post.
Even 20-20K means nothing.... Without a frequency curve, or +/- db level it does not even begin to help anyone understand the sound in any way...
Trinity was SO Qualitative with descriptions, that personally I will never place an order again with such poor information again.
Actual listening reviews by experienced 3rd party testers would be best !
Will do. I have a mailing list of many who ask me to give them the heads up.
On a side note, can you believe we've done 75 pages with zero drama and no fighting? So glad I started this thread, and very glad you all joined in.
Time will tell. Whatever happens it won't be so stressful and full of hard compromise.
Hey all what do you think I should go for next!
Andromeda or Opus #2.
I learned my lesson and only buying daps from reputable sellers only from now on unless headfi user sells.
Not worth not having a case or something missing. or opened box claimed as new.
Hey all what do you think I should go for next!
Andromeda or Opus #2.
I learned my lesson and only buying daps from reputable sellers only from now on unless headfi user sells.
Not worth not having a case or something missing. or opened box claimed as new.