OK, I gave a chance to my Fostex dampers. With the trimmed pads, the position 2 (your favorite) of the dampers was also my favorite, almost as good as my infinitesimally optimised felt damper. If I'd start tuning now, and I knew all these, I likely wouldn't bother with felt dampers, so high is the variation among different makes. However, the felt damper does sound better in the midrange, and it also shows in the measurements to some extent.
I have also tried my second pair of Fostex dampers, and although they measure 99% identical on FR, IR and CSD, the sound difference is bigger than that would suggest.
So far, the summary:
- the best are the dampers rotations, they do not make measurements changes, nor add any ringing on the CSD, but make the sound a lot better
- the pads trimming seem to add a slight, low level and short decay 3 kHz ringing, and a slightly more elevated and more sustained 9 kHz ringing, but well within limits, and overall sounds better than without it.
Next is the cups damping! I am keeping my custom ear pads, as IMHO they are much better than the stock.
Here is a comparative FR between the 3 dampers, all in position 2 of the EZ mods: 2 Fostex (green and violet) and the felt damper (red). Subjectively, the slight rise at 400 Hz of the felt damper makes a bigger subjective difference than you'd think. Also, the impulse response is slightly faster with the felt dampers. But the stock dampers are very close, when used in position 2.
Don't forget these measurements are with modified earpads and cups damping (I have the paper disk from the basic Lawton mod + half polyfill in the cups).
So far yes, I do confirm these mods work exactly in the way you have described. Thanks!
Edit: don't pay attention to the treble dips, it's mainly caused by measurement methodology and repeatability/re-fitting accuracy. I should use an in-ear microphone for the treble alone, then combine the results. However, the comments about the CSD ridges are valid.