Yukon Trooper
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2007
- Posts
- 492
- Likes
- 12
My god, where did they get such a horribly measuring Pro 82?
How is it going with BTR3K?Busy week, will post impressions soon. I can anticipate some “good” findings…
Edit: Also, I got the balanced cable from AE.
How is it going with BTR3K?
My god, where did they get such a horribly measuring Pro 82?
Probably one of the "v0.9" ones.
Just another reminder why it's important to buy the proper v2 at TakstarAudio...
Sorry, very busy at work, can't reply at length.
But... Pro 82 v1 + BTR3K + balanced cable is a surgical knife!, sooo crisp and precise, with better spatial cues and layering. If you like detail (I do), I think this combo outputs your music like a nanoscope, a real positive surprise. However, v1 is already quite bright by itself, so it can be too much for long sessions.
...Also bass is well defined, but perhaps so much that I'm missing bit of oomph and body.
So I wonder now whether v2 would improve on this, since I recall it has a response with less treble and bit more bass. Maybe better match?
Did you listen to v2 on a synergy combo? There is no congestion in v2, but lack of treble spikes does make for s smaller (still large though) soundstage. On synergy combos and BTR3K v2 sounds better.I am using BTR3K mostly wired!, hahaha. Since I have Apple devices and BT just sucks.
I thought v2 had slightly more bass w.r.t. v1. Or if not substantially, perhaps relatively. I listened to that revision for some time (borrowed from a friend), and found it a bit more congested than v1, therefore preferred the original revision in the end. I must be a weird guy.
I don't like Amir's reviews. His reviews are 95% about measurements and EQ, usually there is only 1-2 sentences about headphone's original sound - sometimes not even that. I never know at the end of his review how the headphone sounds.It's good to have reviews, as many as possible. I appreciate the time and effort these people take to elaborate their reports. I do respect ASR in particular.
Only Pro 82 v1 can be bright or unnatural on some tracks, v2 is perfect....We all know that sound preference is very subjective, regardless of target curves. Pro 82 has its own faults IMO, like being too bright for some (as I mentioned just above and several other times) or a tad unnatural at times. Still, I find it hard to beat because of price, comfort and the sound they are able to produce.
I wouldn't say it's a bad buy. Specially if you're into this hobby, have other contenders at home (varied selection of sound profiles) and can also have this one more for this cheap. Just my viewpoint.
Amen...Still, I find it hard to beat because of price, comfort and the sound they are able to produce.
Most Pro 82s available right now are still not a proper v2. Buying anywhere but TakstarAudio is a gamble.@BenF: Amir said it's analysis of a unit purchased very recently. How many v0.9 will there still be?
https://www.head-fi.org/threads/tak...scussion-thread.849965/page-257#post-16112332any information about the sound quality of Takstar Hd2000
and how it is compared to other headphones ,as Takstar HI 2050 , Takstar Pro 80, Isk hp2011 ?
Thanks BenF
30$ may not be a lot of money, but you still shouldn't waste it on a low quality headphone.Thanks BenF
unfortunately the only Takstar available where I live is the Hd2000 , costs 30 US dollars ...
it is almost the same price of
sennheiser hd206 ,
Tascam Th-02
,and akg k52
MONOPRICE 108323
a hard choice ...
Objective measurements are the only thing you can compare. Sound impressions vary from individual to individual, and depend on their taste, preferences and anatomy. I like Amir cause he's not afraid to s**t all over products that don't measure well, while other reviewers just praise them based solely on listening tests. Listening tests alone tell nothing, cause hearing is not consistent and depends on many factors such as mood, level of fatigue and general health.I don't like Amir's reviews. His reviews are 95% about measurements and EQ, usually there is only 1-2 sentences about headphone's original sound - sometimes not even that. I never know at the end of his review how the headphone sounds.
He judges headphones based on the results of his equalization - but that's 100% up to him, not a manufacturer.
Pro 82 is not a headphone that takes EQ well - that's typical for perfectly tuned headphones - they are not meant to be EQd.
My Stax 009 is the same way - even a simple bass boost (which Pro 82 does take well), makes it sound bad.
And keep in mind, age related hearing loss is not a joke, the guy is around the age when Tyll had to retire...
His "preference reference" may be dramatically different from preference of most headphone buyers.
Only Pro 82 v1 can be bright or unnatural on some tracks, v2 is perfect.
Even v1 can be tuned to remove the brightness: Tuning Pro 82 with easy mods
Amen
Most Pro 82s available right now are still not a proper v2. Buying anywhere but TakstarAudio is a gamble.
His Pro 82 is probably the worst measuring one I've seen.