SubPac for Sub Referencing

Discussion in 'Computer Audio' started by iatebillymays, Mar 7, 2014.
First
 
Back
1 2 3 4
  1. drwlf
    Comments on M2 inverted vs. M2 and/or S2?
    I just heard about the device, and initially thought all applications would chest-mounted, e.g. using M2 inverted, as it "feels" most instinctive to me. Something feeling rumbling behind you seems a bit off :p
     
  2. fjrabon

    it's not as big of a deal as you would think, as long as you use the unit subtly (where it is at its best).  Your core isn't super sensitive directionally, it mostly just feels an omnidirectional thump.  That being said, I do prefer the inverted M2.  Especially if I am playing around with it at higher than natural settings.  
     
    A lot of people who use this thing go crazy with it, and have impact it produces set at ***several*** times what the natural impact would be.  If you use the subpac at a "natural" level, then you almost won't think it is on, as your brain just blends it in with your heard sound, into one coherent whole.  If you have it higher, the "spell is broken" and you feel the subpac as its own separate thing, in which case having it on the back is a little off-putting.
     
    All that to say, yes, I prefer in the front, but it actually doesn't matter as much as you would think if you are using it for high fidelity musical enjoyment.
     
    dropbassnotbomb and drwlf like this.
  3. drwlf
     
    Thanks for the lovely description.
    I would think that the chair-mounted application is even more susceptible to resonance/vibration issues, and you'd be too constrained to sit in the same exact position all the time as well, for a uniform experience in mind?
    I guess I should test this one out :p
     
  4. Richter Di
    Best tip ever. Makes a huge difference.
    Got my M2 this christmas. Love it.
    Will also get a Smyth Realizer A16. Backed it a Kickstartert.
    Compared to my Lofelt Basslet the SupPac is a bit slower. (https://lofelt.com/) But the Basslet is very small.
     
  5. Richter Di
    Now as I got my SubPac M2 I was a bit shocked that there is now a M2X version.
    I tried to find out more about the differences
    According to SubPac https://subpac.zendesk.com/hc/en-us...is-the-difference-between-the-M2-and-the-M2x-

    I also found this video claiming his new MX2 broke quite quickly.

    Under the comments some others also mention that their SubPac broke, allthough it is unclear if this was also the M2X.
    Any Bassheads here who know a bit more?
     
  6. Richter Di
    Will have to do a bit more listening. I found it interesting that SubPac themselves write:

    Source: https://subpac.zendesk.com/hc/en-us...amp-what-are-the-best-practices-in-this-case-
     
  7. BassDigger
    "...without adding or subtracting signal" This implies purposefully 'modifying' the signal, if you ask me. As if some might think that the subpac's line-level output has bass added, or some other kind of intentional EQing.

    Unintentional modifications are another thing. Just the fact that the subpac has only 3.5mm connections is enough to deter me from connecting my HPs through it. The fact that several people have already mentioned that the sound coming through it is not so good, seals it. But that's me. I think that you're much better off splitting your output directly from the HP jack (or if your amp has a pre-out, even better): it's less connections, cable, and who knows what else, for your precious signal to travel through.
     
    Last edited: Dec 27, 2017
    Richter Di likes this.
First
 
Back
1 2 3 4

Share This Page