Quote:
Originally Posted by david1978jp /img/forum/go_quote.gif
sbulack,
Now I truly don't understand, you obviously care about good sound - quoted "many thousands of dollars of equipment I had to put into my other (stationary) rigs". But, you showed no interest in Cowon S9, HiFiMAN HM-801, Ipod Classic, Sandisk Clip/Fuse, Sony X series and S:flo2/ Teclast T51 ? Those mp3 players don't cost a lot of money, except HiFiMAN; did you try them and they all disappoint you? Can you please share your reasons? If other players don't deserve my time and money, I want to know. Thank you.
|
Hi david(1978jp).
Thanks for your interest in what I've posted - that you'd ask for clarification.
I'll be happy to make an attempt to clarify what I've posted above in light of what you've asked me about it.
This attempt is a little rambly and may contain redundancies, but I don't have the time now to edit it into a better constructed form, and I think it contains what you may be finding to be missing from my post above. (The Chef thinks the soup is tasty. Feel free to send it back if you don't agree.)
I think that what may be missing from your understanding of my post above is that you might be misinterpreting my not mentioning other DAPs in it.
Each of the many DAPs that are available is a listening tool - with its own set of capabilties and limitations. I view selecing a DAP as choosing the best tool for the listening application at hand. I have many different listening applications, and I find different DAPS to be best suited to various of those applications. Rather than attempting to pick one DAP as the best one to fulfill all of my DAP needs, I select multiple DAPs, including a few of those in your list of non-HiSoundAudio DAPs, each one used where I find it to work best.
I do not mention any DAPs other than the AMP3 in my post above because to do so does not fit the purpose of my post. The purpose of my post is to add to a discussion, which seems to me to be getting increasingly negative (impatient and "ticked-off"), even suspicious, toward HiSoundAudio my very satisfied experience with their AMP3 and the positive expectations for the Studio based on that experience. I compare the sound quality, in that post, to my very nice stationary rigs - rather than to other DAPs, because I have no interest in getting involved in the "which DAP is The Winner" contest that I've seen play out in less-than-productive ways in a variety of threads discussing various DAPs. Yet I want to express my amazement at the sound quality of the AMP3 relative to other audio equipment with which I am well familiar costing many times more. I post this to remind folks that there are reasons to remain positive about what we're waiting for, even though the wait may be wearing us (and perhaps our hopes or expectations or willingness to give someone else the benefit of the doubt) a little thin, and understandably so.
The hypothesis that I showed no interest in other DAPs or the concerns expressed that I might be disappointed by them or that I might not consider them to be deserving of peoples' time or money are not correct interpretations of my not mentioning them. I don't mention them simply because it does not fit my purpose in that post or in this thread to mention them. But now that you've asked me about it, I do own several of the other (non-HiSoundAudio) DAPs you mention in your question to me. I use them regularly and find them to be very useful and enjoyable in listening applications to which I find them to be best suited. In fact, I'm in the midst of investing in an upgrade for one of them to make it even more useful to me in that particular application. I think that other people, including you, would be well served to consider the DAPs you mentioned, as well as the AMP3, for purchase and use, choosing the best suited tool in the bunch which gives the best bang for buck in the listening application(s) for which it will be used.
The AMP3 has some uses for me for which I find it best suited, having to do with what I'll call "optimal transportability and ease of setup and maintenance with minimal loss of Sound Quality", which is not the same as portability. I have a realistic expectation that the Studio will be even better suited for these particular uses than the AMP3 based on the following:
1) giving HiSoundAudio the benefit of the doubt as to their motivations for releasing a higher-cost player - I'm taking it to be to release a player that customers will listen to and use and say, "I like this better." I give them this benefit of the doubt because of my satisfaction with the AMP3. Giving HiSoundAudio this benefit of the doubt, I'm expecting that the extra dollars are going into putting into the Studio aspects of hardware and firmware technology (and product development time) that were compromised out of the AMP3 to put it at a lower price point.
2) Craig's evaluation of the Studio relative to the AMP3. Yes, I know he's selling them. I think that he's smart enough to know that it would not serve his long term business interests to get a short-term run of sales by just saying that it sounded better to him if his first customers would be expected to disagree with his assessment in a public forum. Head-Fiers (whose ears I trust and know to be compatible with mine) speak well of Craig's headphone recabling offerings, which shows me that he has an ear which agrees with theirs, and mine. And he has a LOT of equipment available to try it with and to compare it to.
If the Studio is as much improved in SQ over the AMP3 as I would expect based on the above, then it will be even better suited to my uses based on "optimal transportability and ease of setup and maintenance with minimal loss of Sound Quality" than the AMP3. At the same time, I will continue to use each of my AMP3 units and my other (non-HiSoundAudio) DAPS for my other applications for which I find each to be best-suited.
As I mentioned above, I think this clarification is on the rambly and redundant side, but I think it contains what you may be finding to be missing from my post above. If something still seems to be missing or confusing, please feel free to point it out, and I'll do my best to add or clarify it.
Thanks again for your interest,
Steve (that's what the "s" in sbulack stands for).