FourT6and2
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2015
- Posts
- 196
- Likes
- 54
The Sony Kimber and the Kimber Axios is not the same cable
Ok, true. Where are the specs so we can compare and see why the Axios is $1,000 and the Sony version is $240?
The Sony Kimber and the Kimber Axios is not the same cable
Ok, true. Where are the specs so we can compare and see why the Axios is $1,000 and the Sony version is $240?
Let me tell you the actual measured data of the Sony stock - 50pf/m (diagonal), 60pf/m(neighboring). It is as good as (if not better than) any of those cables from your datasheets but its treble sounds like ****.
Cables are more than metrics and datasheets.
I just measured my stock Sony cables using a Fluke 87V meter. It can measure down to 10pF, +/- 1%. Measured some capacitors on hand that should be 47pF, 10% and meter showed 44pF. Meter seems to be working. Tried to measure capacitance of stock Sony cables and meter showed below range. So if you say the stock cable is 50pF per meter, I'll take your word for it. That's 15pF per FOOT. That's pretty good I think?
The Gotham cable is 75nF per KILOMETER. That's 22pF per foot. Not quite as good as the Sony if it's actually 15pF/ft. Mogami is 17pF per foot. Van Damme is 50pF per meter (15pF per foot). Same as Sony. Canare is 45pF per foot. Whether one sounds better to you is another story. I don't think I can hear the difference between 15pF/ft and 17pF/ft.
BTW, an audiophile cable company out there uses the Mogami cable and sells it for $155 (4 feet).
And sure, it's more than just capacitance. But this is just an example. In any event, I should probably switch industries and start selling $1,000 cables! My point with all of this hasn't changed: As a consumer I want to know what I'm buying. Interesting that when it comes to headphones, people are all about measurements and frequency response graphs. But when it comes to cables, suddenly it's "measurements and specs don't matter."
I don’t really care about specs on any of my gear. I attempt to try before buy and if that is not possible I’ll buy from a place that allows returns. If I like how something sounds (amongst other criteria) then I keep irrespective of any measurements. It’s all a way to the important thing, the music
Yes, this is how I bought all of my headphones since there are no headphone dealers in my area. Some I kept, others I returned or sold. The Z1R's render music superbly and are getting better with every listen.I don’t really care about specs on any of my gear. I attempt to try before buy and if that is not possible I’ll buy from a place that allows returns. If I like how something sounds (amongst other criteria) then I keep irrespective of any measurements. It’s all a way to the important thing, the music
Does anyone know where I can find the official replacement pads for the Z1R?
I won't oppose you on claiming the cable market should be more scientific since they are not at all as you pointed. Just the datasheets like those above do little favor, they are similar to giving you the ohms and sensitivity of a headphone and then nothing else. No CSDs for cables out there. So actually it's the cable data that's not "scientific" enough to convince more consumers.And sure, it's more than just capacitance. But this is just an example. In any event, I should probably switch industries and start selling $1,000 cables! My point with all of this hasn't changed: As a consumer I want to know what I'm buying. Interesting that when it comes to headphones, people are all about measurements and frequency response graphs. But when it comes to cables, suddenly it's "measurements and specs don't matter."
I won't oppose you on claiming the cable market should be more scientific since they are not at all as you pointed. Just the datasheets like those above do little favor, they are similar to giving you the ohms and sensitivity of a headphone and then nothing else. No CSDs for cables out there. So actually it's the cable data that's not "scientific" enough to convince more consumers.
As for the Sony stock they are measured low in C because their conductors are so thin and there is no twist. Therefore its C is only comparably low among those microphone cables you mentioned (they have conductors of like 24awg but Sony stock is only approximately 34+awg). So it's not a well constructed cable with conductors of 34awg; its C could be significantly lower, or it could be twisted for more shielding while its C won't increase. It's not easy to read the cable sound from its data, at least you need to look at its construction.
---
And from my personal view all the factors discussed above have NOTHING to do with the treble harshness of the stock; it's from the material - a weird pure copper for hot, silver plated for cold hybrid. Switched to all pure copper or all silver plated instantly smooth out the harshness by a large amount. I admit I can't explain this properly and can't say it can pass the blind A/B so I'm not expecting anyone would believe this.
Welcome back to the hobby. Hope you enjoy your new Sony’s! They are a great all round headphone.I've been out of the headphone game for a long time, but I'll be receiving my Z1Rs tomorrow (first full-sized headphone in a long, long time). I'm coming from the AKG K701 (which was a TOTL model when I took a break from the hobby). Looking forward to the Sonys!
I've been out of the headphone game for a long time, but I'll be receiving my Z1Rs tomorrow (first full-sized headphone in a long, long time). I'm coming from the AKG K701 (which was a TOTL model when I took a break from the hobby). Looking forward to the Sonys!