mwhals
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2015
- Posts
- 3,295
- Likes
- 2,184
Guys do you think Sony will release anytime soon WM2Z and WM2A ?
I am wondering the same thing.
Guys do you think Sony will release anytime soon WM2Z and WM2A ?
Guys do you think Sony will release anytime soon WM2Z and WM2A ?
I am wondering the same thing.
Sweet...
Have you also updated the 1A to latest firmware?
I feel it is a bit more open now..
I had very old version before though.
I have both and use them regularly. The 1A is my commuting player as I don't want to cary a $3K player around the streets of NYC and it's a lot lighter. As for the sound I find the 1Z has better bass detail and impact along with a larger soundstage.The cons on the 1Z is weight and cost.
You can't go wrong with either.
Thanks guys, I've just ordered 1Z, can't wait to get that beautiful piece of engineering!Purchased the 1Z first then thought maybe the 1A would be cool to own. I used to listen to the 1A more. Most of the time now it’s the 1Z. Just like the old adage about that elusive extra 10% is there but only obtainable at a cost.......the 1Z delivers for those seeking extra. IMO
The 1Z has a thicker meaty sound. It’s more dense and has a soundstage that goes out front and back, where the soundstage of the 1A is more 2 dimensional. The 1A is flat and speedy plus reserved. 1Z has bass boost and treble spike which gets that last ounce of detail or the feeling of detail. Though now with 3.02 software firmware the 1Z has the speed and agility the 1A had with firmware 3.01.
In the end it still could be somewhat what synergy there is between products. Meaning the IER-Z1R was really good with 3.01 and the 1A, as the 1Z was almost too thick, though now with the airy mid-centric additions of 3.02 the IER-Z1R loves the 1Z taking it to a new level IMO
So for me I would go for the 1Z, especially now that prices have dropped down. The 1Z can be had for way less that $3200 now!
That's good to hear, I've read multiple times that 3.02 is more advanced, but SQ is somewhat flawed, guess it was regarding wm1a.I did and tried it, but feel 3.02 is better for the 1Z, not having the lows the 1A needs. IMO
So the 1A is rolled back to 3.01.
Different folks key into different parts of the sound AND have different IEMs or headphones. There is no right or wrong.....lucky we have choices.
Thanks guys, I've just ordered 1Z, can't wait to get that beautiful piece of engineering!
Btw the price after some discount was $2440, ordered from Russia. I also recently bought a MDR-Z1R, here, in Belarus, for $1150, seems like Sony doesn't have high hopes for people buying hi-fi gear at MSRP in this region
That's good to hear, I've read multiple times that 3.02 is more advanced, but SQ is somewhat flawed, guess it was regarding wm1a.
So what is the difference for someone in the United States ordering an international version instead of the USA version? Is it warranty, volume cap, etc.?
Thanks guys, I've just ordered 1Z, can't wait to get that beautiful piece of engineering!
Btw the price after some discount was $2440, ordered from Russia. I also recently bought a MDR-Z1R, here, in Belarus, for $1150, seems like Sony doesn't have high hopes for people buying hi-fi gear at MSRP in this region
where or who did the rewiring?I'm gonna try 3.02 right now. My recabled 1A has too much sub bass sometimes. Lower mid is already fuller, warmer, and better dynamic than normal 1A. I'm not sure about the more forward on the high thing with this lastest firmware.
It is surprising how some people convince the others on the things they dont know.Don’t do it. 3.5 to rca or 4.4 to xlr. Never go balanced to single ended