So, the Objective2 headphone amp - designed entirely around the measurements? (PLEASE READ RULES BEFORE POSTING)

Aug 14, 2011 at 2:51 PM Post #271 of 1,042


Quote:
the performance goal posts keep moving to suit a particular line of argument.


How so?  It's made mostly for either or - pick your gain based on how you're going to use it.  I don't see what the problem here is
confused_face_2.gif

 
 
Aug 14, 2011 at 2:55 PM Post #272 of 1,042


Quote:
That part I know. I was wondering about the conversion from 1db/V to 1db/mW, which I'm pretty sure has a log or two in there. I could probably do it, but I'm a little too sleep deprived to crunch numbers right now. 
 
... doubling power... roughly 6dB... 2^x... equals P... zzzzzz


20x log(x/y) for voltage ratio
 
From Wiki:
dBm indicates that the reference quantity is one milliwatt, while dBu is referenced to 0.775 voltsRMS.[2]
 
Aug 14, 2011 at 3:02 PM Post #273 of 1,042
More on topic here:
 
How does this amp "sound?"  Or does that not matter as long as somebody is happy with a few selective measurements?
 
Aug 14, 2011 at 3:09 PM Post #276 of 1,042


Quote:
Has anyone built it yet? I was under the impression the designer himself only just got the updated pcbs

We've all sure been flapping a lot of gums without any flapping of ears...
 
One report I recall in this thread of someone who built point to point from schematic (& I have no idea about what the lead dress looked like) that review was mixed, as I recall.  Real world dynamic range vs. gain was mentioned as a concern, again, if I recall correctly. 
 
 
 
Aug 14, 2011 at 3:10 PM Post #277 of 1,042
Aug 14, 2011 at 3:12 PM Post #278 of 1,042


Quote:
How so?  It's made mostly for either or - pick your gain based on how you're going to use it.  I don't see what the problem here is
confused_face_2.gif

 


there is no problem as long as you understand the performance limitations and keep them in context.  i think some have glossed over the limitations.  
 
 
Aug 14, 2011 at 3:16 PM Post #280 of 1,042


Quote:
Specific how? It's not supposed to sound like anything.


Well, since this isn't the sound science forum...  I forgot we had some flat earthers here.
 
How about what was your source?  What were your headphones.  What sort of music?  Did you have it turned on?  Battery PS or AC?  You know, that sort of stuff.
 
 
Aug 14, 2011 at 3:21 PM Post #281 of 1,042
Quote:
Well, since this isn't the sound science forum...  I forgot we had some flat earthers here.
 
How about what was your source?  What were your headphones.  What sort of music?  Did you have it turned on?  Battery PS or AC?  You know, that sort of stuff.


I haven't heard it. Flat frequency response and low noise/distortion/crosstalk/etc. means that, when paired with a similarly flat DAC, it should sound like the headphones and nothing else. Provided there's no clipping, obviously.
 
I will remind you that, though this isn't the Science forum, the thread is designed to be an objective discussion of the amp's capabilities. The amp itself was designed for objective performance, not subjective sound quality. Subjective impressions beyond measurable phenomena don't matter for this amp. Not for the people it's designed to please.
 
If you'd like to provide a reason why it wouldn't sound like nothing, when not driven to clipping or otherwise used in a way it isn't meant to be, please do.
 
Aug 14, 2011 at 3:29 PM Post #282 of 1,042


Quote:
I haven't heard it. Flat frequency response and low noise/distortion/crosstalk/etc. means that, when paired with a similarly flat DAC, it should sound like the headphones and nothing else. Provided there's no clipping, obviously.
 
I will remind you that, though this isn't the Science forum, the thread is designed to be an objective discussion of the amp's capabilities. The amp itself was designed for objective performance, not subjective sound quality. Subjective impressions beyond measurable phenomena don't matter for this amp. Not for the people it's designed to please.
 
If you'd like to provide a reason why it wouldn't sound like nothing, when not driven to clipping or otherwise used in a way it isn't meant to be, please do.

 
what does nothing sound like?
 
 
 
Aug 14, 2011 at 3:29 PM Post #283 of 1,042


Quote:
More on topic here:
 
How does this amp "sound?"  Or does that not matter as long as somebody is happy with a few selective measurements?


But the topic is the Objective2 headphone amp, the objective of which was objective performance, hence the name Objective2. Objectively speaking of course.
biggrin.gif

 
Edit: Oops. Didn't see HE's post. Took a short break while writing my post.
 
se
 
 
 
 
Aug 14, 2011 at 3:33 PM Post #285 of 1,042


Quote:
But the topic is the Objective2 headphone amp, the objective of which was objective performance, hence the name Objective2. Objectively speaking of course.
biggrin.gif

 
se

You're right, I forgot that objective and substantive are sort of antonyms in this thread.
 
 
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top