Toddy
100+ Head-Fier
Just found my old HD 480. Must have bought it in 1994 or 1995 when the HD 580 was the unaffordable ‘high end flagship‘ (not counting the then still available original Orpheus
).

Good to know I can totally avoid these then.Beyerdyanamic DT48
get too much sweat/water on the cold metal parts,
I don't know what to do about it.
![]()
pretty good headphones, but insufferable because of the cold metal and sweat/water absorb on the part that close to your ear
measurement:
![]()
*looks almost the same as the Telefunken TH-60 before.
Still I definitely like them, they really have calm sound signature and not bass or scream too muchGood to know I can totally avoid these then.
No amount of fast transients is worth that kind of inferior tonal accuracy.
Thanks for the graphs.@legopart DT48 isn't a flat aluminum diaphragm, it's a dome but its inverted compared to a modern design. its also on a silk suspension. Much more rigid than a mylar cone for not much more weight, especially considering the thicknesses required to make a mylar diaphragm back in the 60s.
Also, @GREQ, it's not that inaccurate. That measurement is lacking a seal. Here's my 1960s DT48 S:
The transducer is extremely capable, boasting incredible resolution, dynamics and extension both ways. However, the housing causes that nasty 4kHz resonance peak and the only way I could see to get rid of it would be some very precise dremel-based surgery to remove the front acoustic lens. oof
Still I definitely like them, they really have calm sound signature and not bass or scream too much
they build really good and I can leave them on the table while for other headphones I store inside case.
Flat aluminium diaphragm instead of light wight Mylar is a bad idea.
but as evener of cheap speakers like Sony Apm D5 (that using some flat aluminium diaphragm for the woofer), I definitely like this unusual idea
![]()
Still have to find some conclusion for the sweat/water absorbing on the top of the driver.