some1x
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- May 20, 2003
- Posts
- 2,199
- Likes
- 86
How about: Sennheiser chose leona plastic for its acoustic properties, and decided to color it silver to aggravate a certain head-fi member(s).
Originally Posted by davidhunternyc /img/forum/go_quote.gif Oh immtbiker, I could on if you want. Let it go immtbiker. Let it go. |
Originally Posted by davidhunternyc /img/forum/go_quote.gif I think pink does signify "lady" and blue does signify "man". If someone chose to paint their car pink or blue, this would be a reflection of the gender of the owner, however, and not the car itself. |
Originally Posted by davidhunternyc /img/forum/go_quote.gif First of all Olblueyez, thank you for your considered response to my statement. This forum is supposed to be a dialog about headphones while responding to others with consideration and respect. I think pink does signify "lady" and blue does signify "man". If someone chose to paint their car pink or blue, this would be a reflection of the gender of the owner, however, and not the car itself. One would not look at a pink Ferrari and confuse the automobile for being a female. I would argue too that blue on an automobile is less gender specific because blue, for instance, is also the color of the sky which doesn't have a gender. Also, I think that paint on the outside of a car is a different discussion altogether. In fact, plastic could be argued to be a great material on the outside of car because of its ability to absorb impacts and resist dents. Saturn used to think so. Also, the body of a car has long been considered a surface on which to express ones desires. It is far more like a canvas and use decoratively. Though I wouldn't want to have a car with flames painted on it, I appreciate it for what it is and isn't. Also, I have said in my opening post that plastic is the material of the 20th century and I highly respect it. It is only when used as a simulation of something else that I have a problem with it. |
Originally Posted by jenneth /img/forum/go_quote.gif I agree that Senn is trying to distinguish the HD800 from their other lower tiered lines. But I think any person who's willing to spend $1400 on a pair of headphone would already be quite well informed in this field. |
Originally Posted by davidhunternyc /img/forum/go_quote.gif I do not have a problem with silver and black stereo equipment. In fact, I find those colors elegant. Let me put in another way. Let's say you had a McIntosh amplifier that really bespoke of its industrial design pedigree. All silver, bold, and beautiful. Then you reached for that big old knob to turn up the volume only to discover that it was made out of silver plastic. Wouldn't you be upset? It feels so thin and insubstantial in the hand. Wouldn't you rather have a big old-fashioned stainless steel knob? Heavy, weighty, something reflecting the behemoth amplifier? Yes, the HD800 is a different animal. It is supposed to feel comfortable on the head, be relatively light weight, and be priced to sell. I acknowledge that compromises had to be made. It is the designers job to work within those contraints but I believe there are a myriad of other options that could have been used. I have convictions and I will not back down from them. I have said elsewhere however that, "convictions are a luxury for those on the sidelines." I very well know that I am not only on the sidelines but I am completely out of the loop. I only wish I could work with the Sennheiser engineers and designers but I can not. I am left to speaking my mind here. Fair enough I think. |
Originally Posted by synaesthetic /img/forum/go_quote.gif this thread is pretty much made to fail. I agree with the desire to have consumer electronics made of metal. It feels and looks nicer, it's more durable, lasts longer and exudes an air of quality and care put into the construction. But why on earth would you want something that sits on your head to be made of something heavy? My neck muscles are throbbing just thinking about it. |