devhen
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- May 16, 2012
- Posts
- 2,282
- Likes
- 100
Easy to drive is not how one usually describes the 600s
They're easy to drive.
There, I just did. ;P
Easy to drive is not how one usually describes the 600s
Haha I'm just playin' with ya. Its all relative. Compared to things like the M80 or ATH-M50 they are hard to drive. But compared to other high impedance headphones they are surprisingly easy to drive.
The HD600s are easy to drive: they sound pretty good out of most sources, and very good out of a significant portion.
The HD600s are hard to drive: they scale more, higher, further than any headphones I've ever had. You will keep buying more powerful and more expensive amps in pursuit of that next level of performance until you finally come full circle and land where you should have started in the first place: at the very cheap and unbeatable Bottlehead Crack.
Adam
Got this coming in the mail mainly to satisfy my curiosity. I hope they are complimentary to my HE500s.
Can someone advise if they are able to be driven adequately from my Audio Gd 15.32 or iBasso PB2s?
As a former K712pro owner, now a new HD600 owner, I think it's funny that AKG tried so hard to make the k702 sound like the HD600's, except the result sounds more like the offspring of a 600 & 650, albeit with two heads; one attractive and one not so, sadly. A strange headphone. Love the 600's though!
Haha I'm just playin' with ya. Its all relative. Compared to things like the M80 or ATH-M50 they are hard to drive. But compared to other high impedance headphones they are surprisingly easy to drive.
+1. The HD600's are not hard to drive at all. When I am in hotels, I've found that the JDS Cmoy is a perfectly acceptable substitute for my desktop setup.