Sennheiser HD 600 Impressions Thread
Sep 16, 2013 at 5:52 PM Post #4,186 of 23,508
Sep 16, 2013 at 5:56 PM Post #4,187 of 23,508
Haha I'm just playin' with ya. Its all relative. Compared to things like the M80 or ATH-M50 they are hard to drive. But compared to other high impedance headphones they are surprisingly easy to drive.
 
Sep 16, 2013 at 6:14 PM Post #4,188 of 23,508
  Haha I'm just playin' with ya. Its all relative. Compared to things like the M80 or ATH-M50 they are hard to drive. But compared to other high impedance headphones they are surprisingly easy to drive.

 
I still maintain they sounded good on my basic dell computer speaker unit.. that's my story and i'm sticking to it :p
Nothing close to good as now but it was better than both of my audio-technica's (which i think are pretty decent) just plugged into the computer speakers.
 
Sep 16, 2013 at 10:07 PM Post #4,190 of 23,508
The HD600s are easy to drive: they sound pretty good out of most sources, and very good out of a significant portion.

The HD600s are hard to drive: they scale more, higher, further than any headphones I've ever had. You will keep buying more powerful and more expensive amps in pursuit of that next level of performance until you finally come full circle and land where you should have started in the first place: at the very cheap and unbeatable Bottlehead Crack.

:D
Adam
 
Sep 16, 2013 at 10:28 PM Post #4,191 of 23,508
The HD600s are easy to drive: they sound pretty good out of most sources, and very good out of a significant portion.

The HD600s are hard to drive: they scale more, higher, further than any headphones I've ever had. You will keep buying more powerful and more expensive amps in pursuit of that next level of performance until you finally come full circle and land where you should have started in the first place: at the very cheap and unbeatable Bottlehead Crack.

biggrin.gif

Adam

 
HAHA. Totally agree now that i've experienced the crack and become a believer, I see absolutely no reason to even consider getting anything else... that's as good as it gets for me for awhile.. I'm sure something out there could improve upon it slightly but there isn't much room to go from it.
When you put on songs and bathe in the music, become enveloped within the music and simply enjoy and get lost in the music... what more can you can ask for.
I even find myself listening to songs a few times in a row because i didn't want it to end, basically i'm enjoying the music again and excited to explore the music again, which is what i wanted and which is all you can ask for imo.
(that will be the last time i go on and on about praising the bottlehead, however.. haha. I don't want to turn things into an ad or make people feel they are forced to go in that direction because not everyone has the means to go that route)
 
Sep 17, 2013 at 2:30 AM Post #4,192 of 23,508
As a former K712pro owner, now a new HD600 owner, I think it's funny that AKG tried so hard to make the k702 sound like the HD600's, except the result sounds more like the offspring of a 600 & 650, albeit with two heads; one attractive and one not so, sadly.  A strange headphone.  Love the 600's though!
 
Sep 17, 2013 at 5:24 AM Post #4,193 of 23,508
Got this coming in the mail mainly to satisfy my curiosity. I hope they are complimentary to my HE500s.

Can someone advise if they are able to be driven adequately from my Audio Gd 15.32 or iBasso PB2s?
 
Sep 17, 2013 at 5:30 AM Post #4,194 of 23,508
Got this coming in the mail mainly to satisfy my curiosity. I hope they are complimentary to my HE500s.

Can someone advise if they are able to be driven adequately from my Audio Gd 15.32 or iBasso PB2s?

 
Easily, very easily. My NFB 5.32 drove them to very loud volumes at around 11 o clock, I listened to it even before that a lot of the time. I believe both yours and mine are the same power output.
 
Sep 17, 2013 at 6:01 AM Post #4,195 of 23,508
Thanks it's heartening to know my purchase won't suck more from the wallet in order to drive them properly. Does it scale well? How much better sound would I get over the audio Gd if I upgraded my amp and is it worth running them off speaker taps the way I run my HE500s
 
Sep 17, 2013 at 10:15 AM Post #4,196 of 23,508
I think 600's are very amp dependent.  Xcan V 8=not good.  Schitt Asgard= very good.  There may be better, but this is the end product for me.  Where did the notion that the K702 or 01 for that matter was an attempt to sound like the 600 come from.  I have both the 701 and the 600.  While they have very different sound signatures, I like both a lot.  Along with my RS1's I am set for a long time.   
 
Sep 17, 2013 at 10:42 AM Post #4,197 of 23,508
  As a former K712pro owner, now a new HD600 owner, I think it's funny that AKG tried so hard to make the k702 sound like the HD600's, except the result sounds more like the offspring of a 600 & 650, albeit with two heads; one attractive and one not so, sadly.  A strange headphone.  Love the 600's though!

 
Interesting! Glad I don't need to buy it :) 
 
Sep 17, 2013 at 10:55 AM Post #4,198 of 23,508
  Haha I'm just playin' with ya. Its all relative. Compared to things like the M80 or ATH-M50 they are hard to drive. But compared to other high impedance headphones they are surprisingly easy to drive.

+1.  The HD600's are not hard to drive at all.  When I am in hotels, I've found that the JDS Cmoy is a perfectly acceptable substitute for my desktop setup. 
 
Sep 17, 2013 at 11:39 AM Post #4,200 of 23,508
Guys, another annoying question.
biggrin.gif
I wonder how much would you rate HD600 bass if compared to HD650? Let's say out of 5, how much is HD600 and HD650? I hope those who owned and tested both can share with me. Just now I listened to Trampoline (feat. 2 Chainz) - Tinie Tempah (Foobar> Wasapi> UD100> FA-003) and I realized sometime more bass is a good thing too. :D Or should I just boost the bass from equalizer next time?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Back
    Top