billerb1
Headphoneus Supremus
I didn’t get a pair of those from AC bro. But I am anxiously awaiting your WE vs 50’s triple mica Fotons comparison.
I only had 6 pairs and a few singles, you had 2 of them, I had one of them...so there was only 3 pairs sold aside form that.Anybody got any opinions on the Istok mini? No talk about them.
Got a bunch of pairs to burn in first, they are easily as good as the WE going from memory, the 2x Foton's I rate a bit below the 3x mica, but not by much at all tbh.I didn’t get a pair of those from AC bro. But I am anxiously awaiting your WE vs 50’s triple mica Fotons comparison.
Ah, was looking for some impressions from others as I have 2 pair of tubes in my chain, mini in the dad and 3x in the MJ2. The combo is quite good, holy grail sounding imo.I only had 6 pairs and a few singles, you had 2 of them, I had one of them...so there was only 3 pairs sold aside form that.
Got a bunch of pairs to burn in first, they are easily as good as the WE going from memory, the 2x Foton's I rate a bit below the 3x mica, but not by much at all tbh.
I didn't find the 2x as good out of the box so to speak, but they do significantly improve with burn in past 100 hours or so. I'd say the difference between them when both burned, to my ears, in my chain, is that the 3x have a touch more 2nd order harmonic distortion, which explains that lush sparkle/excitement across the frequency range. I think the 2x are also very slightly more forward in the upper mids.I never felt like the 2x Fotons opened up in the higher ranges. The 3x’s to me have more weight and richer tone. But that’s my gear and my old ears. Also the 3x’s have about 20 more hours on them than my 2x’s did so maybe I’m not being totally fair.
Was mostly reffering to the 2 50's pair and a freaking awesome pair of untested 62 2x. I rate them higher than the mid 60's pair I got. Though that pair is no sloutch by any means.I never felt like the 2x Fotons opened up in the higher ranges. The 3x’s to me have more weight and richer tone. But that’s my gear and my old ears. Also the 3x’s have about 20 more hours on them than my 2x’s did so maybe I’m not being totally fair.
Was mostly reffering to the 2 50's pair and a freaking awesome pair of untested 62 2x. I rate them higher than the mid 60's pair I got. Though that pair is no sloutch by any means.
I hear ya, my 3x is already burned in and I don't want to take them out, got 4 more pair of tubes that need burned in. And I have always taken out burned in pair and put others in. Only tested the 4 other pairs I got briefly to hear how they sound and quick check for noise/microphonics and put the 3x right back in. Those Istek's reminds me of the Heerlen TS midrange.That makes sense. I think mine are '65 or '66. Like I said, I don't think they are even close to being fully burned-in...but with these 50's triples from AC I doubt they are going to find their way back into the amp, lol.
I hear ya, my 3x is already burned in and I don't want to take them out, got 4 more pair of tubes that need burned in. And I have always taken out burned in pair and put others in. Only tested the 4 other pairs I got briefly to hear how they sound and quick check for noise/microphonics and put the 3x right back in. Those Istek's reminds me of the Heerlen TS midrange.
People giving away free tubes in the thread? That is freaking unheard of!!!Actually, if anyone here wants my original '65 pair you can have them for shipping cost...CONUS only. Let's say $10 for shipping, paypal 'friends and family'. PM me.
If it’s free? I’ll take 3.People giving away free tubes in the thread? That is freaking unheard of!!!