More impressions and comparisons.
The E9 might just best the Lyr for me when it comes to the midrange. On both the D7000 and PC360, the mids were sweeter on the E9. They sounded a little too polite on the Lyr by comparison.
Damn, its hard to choose. The Lyr is the safer choice for people. It won't get close to sibilance whereas the E9 might on certain recordings. The bass on the E9 isn't as impactful, but less controlled than on the Lyr, which has EXCELLENT bass refinement. The midrange/vocals sounds more involved on the E9. The Lyr is definitely easier on the ears for those sensitive to treble and sounds more refined here as well.
So its a bit of a toss up for me at the moment. It sounds more balanced on the Lyr. It's more musical on the E9.
So yeah, its weird. More bass boom, mids sound more sweet and treble is sparklier at similar volumes on the E9. The Lyr has more bass impact, less boom, mids and treble are more fleshed out but less energetic, but the treble sounds better.
If people ever find the Lyr sibilant, the E9 will be even moreso.
So far, I do prefer the D7000 with the Lyr, by a small margin. The thickness has swayed me towards the Lyr. It sounds fuller.
With the PC360, I prefer the E9 by a considerable margin. It highlights the PC360's mids. Noticably better than the Lyr to me.
YMMV, and I will say that they are both awesome amps. Synergy is gonna play a bigger role from what I can tell.
I didn't get the Lyr for just the D7000, but I'm surprised that even though its warmer, the D7000 still sounds crisp, clear, and engaging. I wouldn't justify buying the Lyr over the E9 for the D7000, but I didn't get the Lyr for those to begin with.
I know people are gonna say the Lyr deserves a better source to shine, but the same can be said of the E9. They are still on equal ground in terms of the source.