florence
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2014
- Posts
- 194
- Likes
- 68
Thanks for detailed reply. Comparing to your opinions regarding how it sounds, I find idsd micro black a bit linear not that much analog or tuby sound, also detailed. And I haven't noticed any distortion to the date since two years.I think it depends on your usage scenario and personal preference in sound "type"
The micro BL has very powerful amp, better than a lot of desktop mains powered amps in fact, BUT most of that power comes from the inner battery (it uses a mix of USB power and battery to achieve it) so even if you use it as a desktop unit you have all that battery management stuff, which I personally find a bit annoying.
Wish they had put an optional power input to switch to when stationary (maybe powered by their own ipower wall wart).
DAC wise, the chip IFI likes to use is technically inferior for sure. They use it because it sounds very "analog". They say its distortion profile is similar to tubes distortion.
I am personally using the nano BL right now, which has the same dac chip as the micro, and I can conferm it does sound very lush and analog.
However from what I can hear it is not the cleanest or the most resolving dac out there.
iFi guys are very good at implementing it though, minimizing jitter, power and ground noise, etc.
If D5 is more linear, might be better to head to another DAC then for me. Maybe RME because of EQ features but that's another story. It's doubled price of D5 and I don't know whether it worths to invest $1k in a DAC while there is topping and smsl offerings as well.
The important thing on D5 is ES9038PRO chip that I've never heard of. Still, no idea how it'll sound if I pair it to one of my electrostatic amps. Wish I had a chance to listen to before purchase.
Last edited: