[REVIEW] Sunrise - A Brand New Day
Aug 26, 2010 at 7:50 AM Thread Starter Post #1 of 56

ClieOS

IEM Reviewer Extraordinaire
Joined
May 11, 2004
Posts
21,314
Likes
12,371
Location
Mid Johor, Malaysia
First, I will like to thanks Sunrise for the samples. Many of you might not hear the brand before, but Sunrise has been a fairly well known OEM in the China headphone business. After Yuin’s success on the higher end earbuds market in 2005, Sunrise followed with its own SR-I and SR-II models later on. Though they never went as big as Yuin, the brand did get praised for having good price / performance ratio. After the initial success with their own brand, the company seems to take on a different direction and went full time on OEM business for the last few years.  That’s till just a year ago when they decided that it is time to come back to the market with not just headphone, but a new website and an array of products (which hopefully we shall see more of them in time).  One thing they do intend to clarify with the re-launch of the company is their origin: They are actually a Vietnamese company though they have their factory in China.  Regardless, it is the 4 earphone models in this review that we are going to focus on for now.
 
Sunrise's website: Sunrise-audio.com (not fully working yet)
 
SR-01.jpg

 
SPEC
AS-Miss: 16 ohm | Sensitivity: 115 +/- 3dB | Cable Length: 1M | $20-$25 (depends on seller)
AS-Feeling: 32 ohm | Cable Length: 1M | $30-$40
AS-Charm: 150 ohm | Cable Length: 1M | $65-$85
SW-Xcape: 32 ohm | Cable Length: 1.2M | $70-$80
 
Packaging, Accessories and Build Quality
Packaging is pretty simple though the printing is quite beautiful. The box is about the same size as that of Yuin PK- or CrossRoads HR- series. Inside is plastic packaging sponge holding the hard case which has the earphone.  The hard case is similar to that of SoundMAGIC but instead it has Sunrise logo sticker as different from SoundMAGIC’s clamped in metal plate. The sticker does fall off from time to time but no biggie. Accessories are similar between the three earbuds which are mainly regular and donut foam pad. As the flagship, Charm comes with more foam pad as well as a 3.5mm to 6.5mm adapter. For Xcape, there are 3 pairs of single flanges (S, M, L) as well as two pairs of UE style bi-flanges. Build Quality wise, the 3 earbuds is decent though nothing spectacular to say about. The housing is similar to the Yuin PK- and HR- series. So if you own or have seen a Yuin before, Sunrise earbud will not be unfamiliar. The only real downside is the cable length at only 1m. It would have been better to be around 1.2m like the Xcape. In contrast, Xcape seems to have a better build over all. The housing is unique to Sunrise, the strain relief seems more properly designed and the cable just feels a little better than its earbud cousin. Isolation is about average, enough for daily commute.  
 
One thing to note is that there is almost no real spec being listed on any of the 4 models. While spec can be misleading (especially for those who don’t know what it means as well as for those who over-read it), I still think it needs to be included. Hopefully we will see some actual spec when Sunrise has their website up and going.
 
Sound Quality
As usual, all the earphones have received no less than 50 hrs of burn-in before any serious audition. The whole series is said to have tune toward iPod / iPhone with a warmer, more mid centric sound to balance the colder sound of Apple’s DAP.  To make the review more relevant, the review gears are iPod Nano4 headphone-out as well as line-out fed to Meier Audio’s Corda 3MOVE.
 
SR-02.jpg

 
SR-03.jpg

 
“Miss” is the entry model of the whole line-up that meant to be a decent budget choice replacing the stock earbuds on most DAP and over-priced big brand. One of those earbuds is the Apple iBud. I never do find iBud a bad stock earbuds, at least not the second (current) generation iBud, which is said to be a tuned version of the old Sennheiser MX500 by the same OEM (and they certainly sound quite close). iBud has a fairly clean and light sound with a pretty decent bass slam. In comparison, Miss is warm with a pretty full sounding mid. The vocal is much sweeter than iBud but it isn’t quite as resolving on each note. The sharper sounding iBud might sound just a tad better at first, but in the long run the smoother, warmer and pretty much fatigue-free sounding Miss could be a good alternative for those who are looking for a more relaxing sound.
 
SR-04.jpg

 
SR-05.jpg

 
“Feeling” is the next step up and aims to challenge the pretty popular PK3. PK3 has a very lively and easy going sound signature which is great for casual listening but it can also be a little edgy and lose its bass body when it is used without foam pad. Feeling on the other hand is best with donut foam (in fact, all 3 models are best with donut foam).  The overall sound is more balance than PK3, though also not quite as lively. It is smooth with a good body while retains a decent amount of detail. The strength of PK3 is in its treble and bass while the strength of Feeling is in its warm mid and an overall non-intrusive sound signature.
 
SR-06.jpg

 
SR-07.jpg

 
“Charm” is top of the line for Sunrise earbuds. With 150ohm of impedance, it is obviously meant to be driven by an amp and a challenger to PK1. To be frank at first, it is not an earbud that will best PK1, but it is good enough to be one of the best earbuds I have ever heard. Compared to the almost effortless PK1, the warm and smooth sounding Charm does sound a little bit ‘boxed-in’ and doesn’t show quite enough air and soundstage to beat PK1. Though purely on mid alone, Charm’s fuller body and better texture do give PK1 a good fight. The smooth and warm signature of Charm, which seems to be shared with in the whole line, is pretty much a double edge sword. It gives the series a very likeable, non-intrusive sound, but also limits air, soundstage and the overall detail. They are best with a cold sounding source such as the s:flo2 and iPod / iPhone to a great extent, where the warmness is more balanced out and the synergy is at its best.
 
SR-08.jpg

 
SR-09.jpg

 
“Xcape” is perhaps the crown jewel of Sunrise. Originally being announced as the SRX a year ago, the newly tuned version is nothing you want to escape from, but lost into. The overall sound signature is neutral with slight warmness. Bass is not large, but shows present and impact when needed. Mid is slightly full and gives a slightly sweet and well texture vocal. Treble is well extended and smooth while retains a decent amount of sparkle. Soundstage is about average. While nothing seems to stand out, the quantity of each elements are well balanced to make this IEM neither overly exciting nor too boring; In other words, it does no wrong. It has a good portion of everything and blend them well, but excels on none – Don't get it wrong: Being good not for one particular reason isn’t something that common in the IEM world, but that is what the Xcape is able to achieve.
 
SR-10.jpg

 
Verdict
It is hard to put a verdict on 4 different earphones that target at different level of users, though it is still very obvious that Sunrise does indeed have very good price / performance ratio with all of their products (and perhaps more true to those who reside in Vietnam since Sunrise is selling their products at cheaper price in their homeland). For the outstanding value, I will recommend Xcape with a Sonic Diamond Award to anyone who is looking for an IEM with nothing more than just plain good sound. For those who are interested in rating, check out my earbuds round-up page and IEM list.
 
Note: I am not sure where you can buy these earphones online now, but as I was told some should pop up on eBay soon.
[UPDATE] It seems Xcape can already be found on Amazon UK and eBay now
 
[EDIT] Post# 5999,
biggrin.gif

 
Aug 26, 2010 at 9:00 AM Post #3 of 56
Nice review.
 
You seem to have a knack for giving out your sonic diamonds for earphones that aren't easily accessed :p Eterna (when you first reviewed it), DBA-02 and now this one
 
Aug 26, 2010 at 10:42 AM Post #7 of 56
Quote:
very nice review, simple but enough, just wonder if Xcape can defeat my current SoundMagic Pl30, I gonna find a dealer in U.K


Wow, your lucky day. My contact on Sunrise just told me that their UK dealer is already selling the Xcape on Amazon UK and the eBay dealer should be up and running in next few days.
 
Aug 27, 2010 at 11:08 AM Post #9 of 56
Thanks for the great review (and congrats on 6000+ posts)!  I was interested in these ever since you listed them as "review in progress" even though I had no idea what they even were
redface.gif
.
 
Anyway, great to see more manufacturers producing earbuds.  The Charm seems to be surprisingly low-priced for its performance though I'm not sure if I'll ever get to try it due to its amp requirement.  The Xcape seems to be yet another great entry in the sub-$100 canalphone market.  And it's great to see the company pack in that great-looking case even with their lowest-end earbuds.  (Does anybody else think that "Miss" is a terrible name for a product that will most likely be a "hit?")  Needless to say, I'll be keeping an eye on Sunrise while crossing my fingers for an easier-to-drive version of the Charm.
 
Aug 27, 2010 at 11:34 AM Post #10 of 56
Would you say there are any comparable products to the Xcape?  I'm just curious if there are any products around the Xcape people should be looking at as well and then to weigh personal preferences against each.
 
Aug 27, 2010 at 1:41 PM Post #11 of 56
Quote:
Thanks for the great review (and congrats on 6000+ posts)!  I was interested in these ever since you listed them as "review in progress" even though I had no idea what they even were
redface.gif
.
 
Anyway, great to see more manufacturers producing earbuds.  The Charm seems to be surprisingly low-priced for its performance though I'm not sure if I'll ever get to try it due to its amp requirement.  The Xcape seems to be yet another great entry in the sub-$100 canalphone market.  And it's great to see the company pack in that great-looking case even with their lowest-end earbuds.  (Does anybody else think that "Miss" is a terrible name for a product that will most likely be a "hit?")  Needless to say, I'll be keeping an eye on Sunrise while crossing my fingers for an easier-to-drive version of the Charm.

I bet you can still recall a mysterious top-of-the-line earbud I was supposed to review last year? I was referring to Sunrise back then. Well, it is not the Charm but something even better, though for what ever reason Sunrise has dropped that project and replaced it with Charm.
 
Quote:
Would you say there are any comparable products to the Xcape?  I'm just curious if there are any products around the Xcape people should be looking at as well and then to weigh personal preferences against each.

The direct competitor will be RE0 - same price, same level of SQ with different sound signature. Check out the link to the IEM list at the end of the first post.
 
 
Aug 29, 2010 at 6:38 AM Post #12 of 56
Hi, ppl! I am the ebay dealer. Stocks should come in by tml. Just wanna say in very simplistic terms i will actually see the X-cape as RE0 with slightly better bass. The difference between them is rather minute. X-cape trades a slight decrease in clarity for a slight increase in bass. However, X-cape beats the RE0 in accessorries as it comes with a hard case and is sold for about the same price :)
 
P.S: Another advantage is that the X-cape is much easier to drive than RE0 perfect for ipod users :)
 
Aug 29, 2010 at 12:22 PM Post #13 of 56
Okay, the review of the X-cape doesn't sound so great but yet it is an "RE0 competitor". ClieOS' description seems to make them sound like a PR200 competitor more than an RE0 competitor.
 
I guess after a few reviews we'll find out where they stand. Tough competition with the likes of the TD100, MC5, CX281, etc. in the $50 to $79 range.
 
Aug 29, 2010 at 1:00 PM Post #14 of 56


Quote:
Okay, the review of the X-cape doesn't sound so great but yet it is an "RE0 competitor". ClieOS' description seems to make them sound like a PR200 competitor more than an RE0 competitor.
 
I guess after a few reviews we'll find out where they stand. Tough competition with the likes of the TD100, MC5, CX281, etc. in the $50 to $79 range.


Hi u must be mistaken :) I have the PR200 and it doesn't sound like that. Moreover, if you look at the SQ scores the X-cape is rate 4.6 the same as RE-0
 
Aug 29, 2010 at 3:20 PM Post #15 of 56
To be clear again, I am not saying Xcape as a direct competitor of RE0 in sound signature wise, but rather in SQ and price wise. They both have pros and cons of their own. I haven't heard the PR200 myself, but I don't have a pair of PR300 with me. If it is anything to go by, I will say Xcape sounds more refine than PR300 to me on my reviewing gears. Though I must also admit the PR300 is really great fun for casual listening especially consider how cheap it is.
 
Quote:
Okay, the review of the X-cape doesn't sound so great but yet it is an "RE0 competitor". ClieOS' description seems to make them sound like a PR200 competitor more than an RE0 competitor.
 
I guess after a few reviews we'll find out where they stand. Tough competition with the likes of the TD100, MC5, CX281, etc. in the $50 to $79 range.



 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top