Quote:
Originally Posted by wavio /img/forum/go_quote.gif
i'm on my way taking the mx760 as well, but suddenly yuin pk-2 seems to be very tempting...
could anyone make comparison between the mx760 and pk-2 for me?
or could anyone tell me the best earphone (non-iem) for my sansa fuze?
i prefer no amplifier needed...
|
Hey wavio! Welcome to Head-Fi!
Unfortunately, I have not tried the Yuins, but I can point you to ClieOS'
http://www.head-fi.org/forums/f103/e...und-up-441400/ which is an excellent and concise comparison review, though he hasn't tried the PK2s either.
Speaking strictly of the Sennheiser buds, I find that the MX760 sounds great even unamped. The MX90 on the other hand could use some extra power, so naturally it sounds better amped.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sparky191 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I am a big fan of the MX500's. Down to my last pair though. I picked up the MX460's and I think they are ok, better than cheapo buds, but lacking in bass compared to the Mx500's and the Mx500's are not bass heavy themselves.
I'm going to pick up these MX760's though I had a pair of Sonys with a heavy cord which drove me mad. What are the MS760's like compared to the MX90/5VC? or the MX80 Sport? Or the MX760 vs PK3/PK2?
Great view BTW. Much appreciated.
|
Thanks for the compliment Sparky!
Interesting that you find the MX460s lacking in bass. The MX460s aren't bassy by any means, but they do put out enough provided that the fit is good and that the foams are used. The MX760s certainly have more bass, definitely more than neutral.
I should also remind you that the MX360, as stated in the review, sounds to me like a bassier MX500, so perhaps you could try those out as well as they should be cheap in your neck of the woods.
As I told wavio, I have not had a chance to listen to the Yuins, but if you check ClieOS' link above there should be a comparison between the PK3 and the MX760.
Also, here are some other comparisons between the PK3 and the MX760:
Quote:
Originally Posted by kmhaynes /img/forum/go_quote.gif
From a couple of links sent to me, I picked up the MX-760 a couple of weeks ago. They are the most satisfying of all the MX series, and that would stand to reason. They have the full sound of the 560+660 and about 80% of the 660 superwide soundstage (probably too wide). I wasn't sure if I would like the short cord + extension, but it hasn't bothered me. I now sleep with these and have sold the PK3 which was just too mid-centric, treble shy for me.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fungi /img/forum/go_quote.gif
So I got the PK3 today (gj Head-Direct, that was fast) and have been comparing it to the MX760 for a while. I'm using the solid foam covers for both.
Basically, they're both rather good but the MX760 is a step above, with amazing soundstage for earbuds (PK3 has the "earbud" sound that's kind of stretched to both sides, not forming as coherent a soundstage) and less spitty/grainy treble. MX760 also has a lusher sound with a little boost in the midbass that I think works better.
The one problem I have with the MX760 is the short cord length (that only reaches to about my bellybutton) that forces you to use the included extension cord, which adds some weight that tugs down. Not the best to use on the go without a clip or something (or a neck strap for your mp3 player).
Summary: MX760 wins for me, except for the form factor. Awesome earbuds.
|
Here's my quick take on the differences between the MX760 and MX90:
Quote:
Originally Posted by kjk1281 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
That leaves the MX760 and MX90, which each have their own strengths and weaknesses. The MX90 utilizes the twist-to-fit system (see ClieOS's excellent review for more info), and is the more balanced sounding of the two. I find it sounds great out of my Clip, with very smooth midrange, good treble detail, and sufficient (but perhaps lacking to some) bass. However, some DAPs may not have sufficient driving power to make them sound their best.
The MX760's sound has quite a bit more bass, much larger soundstage, and overall it's a more "open" type of sound. The bass is more abundant, the midrange more airy, and the treble is more detailed although it has less control. The MX760 is far less picky about sources, at least in my experience.
The MX760 is a warm earphone and the more musical/"fun" of the two while the MX90 is closer to neutral. It's really hard for me to choose between the two, but overall I think I may prefer the MX760, at least today.
|
Recently, I also snatched a pair of MX75s, the previous version of the MX85. There may be some differences/improvements in the newer model, but overall I found that the MX75 is bassier with slightly recessed midrange and less detailed compared to the MX90.
Sorry for the long post.