Why tune/make one when his existing Annihilator does a pretty damn good job. The bass might not be the best, but overall I think it is one of the most complete package out there.
Precog's IEM Reviews & Impressions
- Thread starter Precogvision
- Start date
Why tune/make one when his existing Annihilator does a pretty damn good job. The bass might not be the best, but overall I think it is one of the most complete package out there.
EJO7 - neither better in bass nor in sound stage. Fiio FH9 - competitive bass but just above average sound stage.
MMk2 good bass but not to the point fully and for sound stage it might be discussed
DynamicEars
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2019
- Posts
- 3,636
- Likes
- 10,175
Bring that to other thread and goodluck with your long night
I'm pretty sure you know what i mean
sanakimpro
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2014
- Posts
- 420
- Likes
- 364
Congrats on your new shiny! My IER-Z1R is just over 6 months as my EDC and I'm loving it
bass with DX320 is "too fast and tight" though, hoping new Amp14 NuTubes can soften it down.. AMA if needed 
hevelaoak
100+ Head-Fier
any words regarding Letshuoer Cadenza @Precogvision ?
hevelaoak
100+ Head-Fier
yeah, that one is undoubtedly amazing. but in this case, I'd like to see a set with a planar driver for the midrange. I bet it's gonna be hard to tune but who knows...
I heard the prototype a while back, but I have not heard the production version which should have better treble extension. Resolve has the unit right now, and I think he'll review it first, so maybe I'll snag it after.
Sennheiser IE200 Impressions
Price: $150
Configuration: 1DD
Headphones.com review unit: https://headphones.com/products/sennheiser-ie200-in-ear-headphones?_pos=1&_psq=sennheiser+ie+200&_ss=e&_v=1.0#looxReviews
The single-DD market is dominated by a very specific type of sound signature that falls along the lines of the Harman in-ear target with some extra warmth. It’s a simple, tried-and-true formula that caters to a majority of listeners which is why so many companies try to emulate it:
But Sennheiser has always had other ideas about how to tune their IEMs. Most of their past IEMs would be best described as “colored”, a description often realized through a recessed upper-midrange region and copious amounts of mid-treble. In the past, this has made them polarizing listens; I was a fan of Sennheiser’s IE900 but knew that it would not be for everyone. Beginning with the IE600, however, Sennheiser took a dramatic shift to tuning their IEMs.
The IE200 seems to embody a lot of what Sennheiser has learned from the IE600. The most impressive part about the IE200 would no doubt be its treble response. Single-DDs are often synonymous with poor treble extension. Of course, there are some recent outliers, like the CCA CRA+, but these would best be described as more uncontrolled in the upper-treble and artificial sounding. Sennheiser’s own IE900 is possibly one of the best examples of a “controlled” treble response wherein it makes use of resonance chambers in the shell to tastefully fine-tune the mid-treble while maintaining extension. The IE200 doesn’t quite measure up to the IE900 in this regard - it lacks some intensity at 5kHz to the initial crack of snares, and it’s a little more splashy - but it comes pretty close for being a fraction of the cost. It also does away with some of the treble glare that I found harsh on the IE600.
Other aspects of the IE200’s tuning are less praiseworthy, but quite reasonable for $150. The bass shelf of the IE200 is sharply sub-bass focused for a clean response. I do find it somewhat dry-sounding; most of this sentiment would be baked into the elevated treble response which neuters overall perception of bass decay. The midrange of the IE200 is somewhat unique amongst most single-DDs in that it does indeed sport a more relaxed 3-4kHz region in typical Sennheiser fashion. However, it is not done egregiously, and I almost find myself wishing there was either 1) more warmth in the lower-mids or 2) more recession from 3-4kHz to counteract the IE200’s treble emphasis. As it stands, the IE200 can surprisingly come across somewhat thin-sounding in the midrange.
Technicalities on the IE200 are impressive. The more reserved presence region and excellent treble extension encourages listeners to listen more closely to vocals, for which trailing note edges are easily picked-up on. The IE200, irrespective of its price, is easily in the running for being one of the more detailed sounding single-DDs I’ve heard. Comparatively, imaging is mostly average wherein the soundstage of the IE200 does not expand outside the shells despite relatively good distinction between individual instruments.
In the end, the IE200 is neither a slap in the face to the existing landscape of sub-$200 single-DDs, nor does it entirely put Sennheiser back in the good graces of IEM enthusiasts. However, it does offer a flavor of tuning that you won’t find at a cheaper price, and I think it’s well-worth a listen if you’re looking for a break from the increasingly homogenous budget market.
Bias Score: 6/10
All critical listening done with the stock cable and stock medium silicone tips (I am aware of the extra vent).
Price: $150
Configuration: 1DD
Headphones.com review unit: https://headphones.com/products/sennheiser-ie200-in-ear-headphones?_pos=1&_psq=sennheiser+ie+200&_ss=e&_v=1.0#looxReviews
The single-DD market is dominated by a very specific type of sound signature that falls along the lines of the Harman in-ear target with some extra warmth. It’s a simple, tried-and-true formula that caters to a majority of listeners which is why so many companies try to emulate it:
But Sennheiser has always had other ideas about how to tune their IEMs. Most of their past IEMs would be best described as “colored”, a description often realized through a recessed upper-midrange region and copious amounts of mid-treble. In the past, this has made them polarizing listens; I was a fan of Sennheiser’s IE900 but knew that it would not be for everyone. Beginning with the IE600, however, Sennheiser took a dramatic shift to tuning their IEMs.
The IE200 seems to embody a lot of what Sennheiser has learned from the IE600. The most impressive part about the IE200 would no doubt be its treble response. Single-DDs are often synonymous with poor treble extension. Of course, there are some recent outliers, like the CCA CRA+, but these would best be described as more uncontrolled in the upper-treble and artificial sounding. Sennheiser’s own IE900 is possibly one of the best examples of a “controlled” treble response wherein it makes use of resonance chambers in the shell to tastefully fine-tune the mid-treble while maintaining extension. The IE200 doesn’t quite measure up to the IE900 in this regard - it lacks some intensity at 5kHz to the initial crack of snares, and it’s a little more splashy - but it comes pretty close for being a fraction of the cost. It also does away with some of the treble glare that I found harsh on the IE600.
Other aspects of the IE200’s tuning are less praiseworthy, but quite reasonable for $150. The bass shelf of the IE200 is sharply sub-bass focused for a clean response. I do find it somewhat dry-sounding; most of this sentiment would be baked into the elevated treble response which neuters overall perception of bass decay. The midrange of the IE200 is somewhat unique amongst most single-DDs in that it does indeed sport a more relaxed 3-4kHz region in typical Sennheiser fashion. However, it is not done egregiously, and I almost find myself wishing there was either 1) more warmth in the lower-mids or 2) more recession from 3-4kHz to counteract the IE200’s treble emphasis. As it stands, the IE200 can surprisingly come across somewhat thin-sounding in the midrange.
Technicalities on the IE200 are impressive. The more reserved presence region and excellent treble extension encourages listeners to listen more closely to vocals, for which trailing note edges are easily picked-up on. The IE200, irrespective of its price, is easily in the running for being one of the more detailed sounding single-DDs I’ve heard. Comparatively, imaging is mostly average wherein the soundstage of the IE200 does not expand outside the shells despite relatively good distinction between individual instruments.
In the end, the IE200 is neither a slap in the face to the existing landscape of sub-$200 single-DDs, nor does it entirely put Sennheiser back in the good graces of IEM enthusiasts. However, it does offer a flavor of tuning that you won’t find at a cheaper price, and I think it’s well-worth a listen if you’re looking for a break from the increasingly homogenous budget market.
Bias Score: 6/10
All critical listening done with the stock cable and stock medium silicone tips (I am aware of the extra vent).
Last edited:
iatransducer
New Head-Fier
I heard a lot of people didn't really like the bass. It makes sense because the mechanism that allows for two tuning modes leaks a lot of bass, as well as the possibly sub-par seal with the stock tips. If you just tape up the nozzle and use different tips, I think that the bass quality might improve. Sure, the 2nd tuning is lost, but I highly doubt that a large majority of listeners would even bother with the 2nd signature, much less prefer it.Sennheiser IE200 Impressions
Price: $150
Configuration: 1DD
Headphones.com review unit: https://headphones.com/products/sennheiser-ie200-in-ear-headphones?_pos=1&_psq=sennheiser+ie+200&_ss=e&_v=1.0#looxReviews
The single-DD market is dominated by a very specific type of sound signature that falls along the lines of the Harman in-ear target with some extra warmth. It’s a simple, tried-and-true formula that caters to a majority of listeners which is why so many companies try to emulate it:
But Sennheiser has always had other ideas about how to tune their IEMs. Most of their past IEMs would be best described as “colored”, a description often realized through a recessed upper-midrange region and copious amounts of mid-treble. In the past, this has made them polarizing listens; I was a fan of Sennheiser’s IE900 but knew that it would not be for everyone. Beginning with the IE600, however, Sennheiser took a dramatic shift to tuning their IEMs.
The IE200 seems to embody a lot of what Sennheiser has learned from the IE600. The most impressive part about the IE200 would no doubt be its treble response. Single-DDs are often synonymous with poor treble extension. Of course, there are some recent outliers, like the CCA CRA+, but these would best be described as more uncontrolled in the upper-treble and artificial sounding. Sennheiser’s own IE900 is possibly one of the best examples of a “controlled” treble response wherein it makes use of resonance chambers in the shell to tastefully fine-tune the mid-treble while maintaining extension. The IE200 doesn’t quite measure up to the IE900 in this regard - it lacks some intensity at 5kHz to the initial crack of snares, and it’s a little more splashy - but it comes pretty close for being a fraction of the cost. It also does away with some of the treble glare that I found harsh on the IE600.
Other aspects of the IE200’s tuning are less praiseworthy, but quite reasonable for $150. The bass shelf of the IE200 is sharply sub-bass focused for a clean response. I do find it somewhat dry-sounding; most of this sentiment would be baked into the elevated treble response which neuters overall perception of bass decay. The midrange of the IE200 is somewhat unique amongst most single-DDs in that it does indeed sport a more relaxed 3-4kHz region in typical Sennheiser fashion. However, it is not done egregiously, and I almost find myself wishing there was either 1) more warmth in the lower-mids or 2) more recession from 3-4kHz to counteract the IE200’s treble emphasis. As it stands, the IE200 can surprisingly come across somewhat thin-sounding in the midrange.
Technicalities on the IE200 are impressive. The more reserved presence region and excellent treble extension encourages listeners to listen more closely to vocals, for which trailing note edges are easily picked-up on. The IE200, irrespective of its price, is easily in the running for being one of the more detailed sounding single-DDs I’ve heard. Comparatively, imaging is mostly average wherein the soundstage of the IE200 does not expand outside the shells despite relatively good distinction between individual instruments.
In the end, the IE200 is neither a slap in the face to the existing landscape of sub-$200 single-DDs, nor does it entirely put Sennheiser back in the good graces of IEM enthusiasts. However, it does offer a flavor of tuning that you won’t find at a cheaper price, and I think it’s well-worth a listen if you’re looking for a break from the increasingly homogenous budget market.
Bias Score: 6/10
All critical listening done with the stock cable and stock medium silicone tips (I am aware of the extra vent).
Tape it, tape it, tape it 
iatransducer
New Head-Fier
YesTape it, tape it, tape it
Hi Precog, what are your impressions of the EE Odyssey? It's hard to find details and reviews out there. I'm debating between the EE Odin, EVO and Odyssey. I have the U12Ts and want more bass and energy. Thanks!
there was a graph of comparing EVO and Odyssey and they had the same bass level, but Odyssey had more sparkle up top, with more relaxed upper mids. Odin has much more controlled bass, and I think it'd make a great complement to the U12t because of its midrange clarity and a more distinct bass shelf. Odyssey and EVO are less of a safe choice, unless you can audition them first.
Edit: Or wait until EE announces their new IEMs
Last edited:
Hey, I only heard it briefly at CanJam SoCal and haven't been able to hear it again since. These were my impressions at the time:
Now that there are measurements out, I'd say my impressions track pretty closely to how it compares to the Odin and EVO. Odin is probably the safest bet of the three and it will give you the upper-midrange forwardness that you lose out on with the U12t. EVO is the most conventionally V-shaped, and Odyssey might work if you want something more colored.
Thank you so much for your reply! I appreciate it!
Last edited:
Users who are viewing this thread
