Jan 5, 2009 at 11:36 PM Post #4,081 of 9,811
the AMB.org epsilon12:

3172320174_e393df56de_o.jpg


assembly and photo by linux-works
wink.gif


this is a turn-on delay (about 3 secs) and also a DC voltage protection checker. if the voltage across the circuit's input ever get to 'dangerous DC' for too long, the relay takes the headphones out of the circuit. there is also a turn-off non-delay (grin) that tries to remove the phones from the amp before the amp has a chance to send out any close-down squeals or pops
wink.gif


this is a very tight/small circuit - meant to be included in existing amps. I haven't decided which of my amps will get this, yet
wink.gif
 
Jan 5, 2009 at 11:47 PM Post #4,082 of 9,811
Quote:

Originally Posted by linuxworks /img/forum/go_quote.gif
this is a turn-on delay (about 3 secs) and also a DC voltage protection checker.


Pardon me, good sir 'Works, but why socket opamps in a turn-on delay circuit? Rather, what benefit would be gained by swapping them?
 
Jan 5, 2009 at 11:51 PM Post #4,083 of 9,811
the default decision is 'always socket unless you are sure. and even then, socket'

wink.gif
wink.gif



would sockets hurt here? nothing is high speed, so, no harm.

is cost an issue? ha! this is head-fi (lol).

can the installer (me) make a mistake and have to unsolder things? yup - likely!

judges decision: install sockets!

..so there you go
wink.gif
 
Jan 5, 2009 at 11:57 PM Post #4,084 of 9,811
Alright, pretty straight-forward. Though I must say, from the look of those solder joints I doubt you spend much time huddled over an opamp with a braid...
smily_headphones1.gif
 
Jan 6, 2009 at 12:24 AM Post #4,085 of 9,811
thanks.

when I know something is going to be photo'd, I'll dress with extra solder even though its not electrically needed
wink.gif
that means fluxing the top layer and touching it a bit for extra fill-in and niceness. of course that makes removing things harder so you HAVE to be sure before you do this.

some of the fancy shiny blue vishays were not so shiny this time around ;( digikey, you get a B- on the 10k vishays but A+ on the rest of them (lol). I do like it when the parts come out nice and shiny. today's stuffed boards can be so colorful - and I find that cool, actually.
 
Jan 6, 2009 at 2:55 AM Post #4,086 of 9,811
I was gonna say nice job on the solder puddling but then you cheated and fixed her up
biggrin.gif


I bet the job would have been sound from the get go...what you did takes skill.

Nice job on the delay BTW
smily_headphones1.gif


Peete.
 
Jan 6, 2009 at 5:01 AM Post #4,087 of 9,811
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sherwood /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Pardon me, good sir 'Works, but why socket opamps in a turn-on delay circuit? Rather, what benefit would be gained by swapping them?


Linux gave acceptable reaoning, but I'll add to it. What if you fry the opamp somehow? They are a fairly sensitive device, so a good static shock could kill it. Then it's a pain to replace. If it's socketed, replacing it is simple.

Quote:

Originally Posted by linuxworks /img/forum/go_quote.gif
thanks.

when I know something is going to be photo'd, I'll dress with extra solder even though its not electrically needed
wink.gif
that means fluxing the top layer and touching it a bit for extra fill-in and niceness. of course that makes removing things harder so you HAVE to be sure before you do this.

some of the fancy shiny blue vishays were not so shiny this time around ;( digikey, you get a B- on the 10k vishays but A+ on the rest of them (lol). I do like it when the parts come out nice and shiny. today's stuffed boards can be so colorful - and I find that cool, actually.



Those blue resistors are Vishays? Mine are always that redish brown rust color. A different series perhaps?

I do agree that the blue ones are more more pleasing to the eye. I'm gonna be building another amp soon, so I'd like to use those.
 
Jan 6, 2009 at 7:32 AM Post #4,088 of 9,811
Yeah, the blue resistors are Vishays, CMF50 I believe. They are great looking parts, and good performance, about the same as RN55, but much more expensive.

Linux, you seem to be setting a trend for good soldering and photography. Keep it up, looks great!
 
Jan 6, 2009 at 8:09 AM Post #4,089 of 9,811
Quote:

Originally Posted by linuxworks /img/forum/go_quote.gif
the AMB.org epsilon12:

this is a turn-on delay (about 3 secs) and also a DC voltage protection checker. if the voltage across the circuit's input ever get to 'dangerous DC' for too long, the relay takes the headphones out of the circuit. there is also a turn-off non-delay (grin) that tries to remove the phones from the amp before the amp has a chance to send out any close-down squeals or pops
wink.gif



Hi be sure to check G1/G2 again. I had massive problems with bad sound, offset and stuff like that. Until I realised that G1 ist connected to G2 and vice versa (at least in the version I own). And from your pictures I ca see that you are only use G1.

But apart from that: I am just jealous (build & photo quality)!

Best regards

_atari_
 
Jan 6, 2009 at 8:17 AM Post #4,090 of 9,811
hi atari,

the version I have has the fixed pc board. I'll doublecheck though - thanks for the tip
wink.gif


in fact I'm going to be using all 4 inputs. I spoke with AMB and wanted to have a poor man's mute button leveraged from this mute-relay board. the trick is to use the 4th ground wire (they are ALL the same, no difference between 'hot' and ground on this voltage-summer) and send something 'high' (like a TTL 1) and that will 'tip' the circuit and cause a muting effect. I'm planning on just having a toggle on my IR receiver that goes to this 4th gnd pad. a real cheap and simple mute on/off via remote - using the protection circuit for double duty!

btw, I used no flash on the photo - my lighting style is to put the camera on a tripod, use selftimer (to trigger itself shake-free) and give it a long exposure (high f-stop number) which lets me THEN wave lights around from different angles - illuminating the subject 'evenly' before the shutter finally closes up again. I call it 'flying lights' for obvious reasons
wink.gif
even a flashlight (in motion, never stopped) will do if you have a several second long exposure time. and be sure to set the EV to the minus direction since you are flooding the subject with more light than the light meter had 'planned' on.
 
Jan 6, 2009 at 8:51 AM Post #4,092 of 9,811
linuxworks

Any hints about how to get such good photos without having to spend a fortune, because they are truly fantastic quality
 
Jan 6, 2009 at 8:55 AM Post #4,093 of 9,811
linuxworks, The input G1 is connected to the output G2 (and vice versa) on all ε12s. See the schematic. I should fix the silkscreen labels but it's much easier to change the schematic.
biggrin.gif
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top