PLUSSOUND AUDIO - Introducing BLUETOOTH CUSTOM CABLES - Available for 2-PIN/CIEMs, MMCX, FitEar, Sennheiser, Audeze, and more
post-13736375
Post #16 of 76
Joined
Apr 3, 2012
Messages
1,426
Reaction score
677
Joined
Apr 3, 2012
Posts
1,426
Likes
677
How does the LCD 4 sound with this.
I am really interested and curious
Not optimistic about the sound quality.
I'd be curious on how the HD800S would sound on these.

Can good amplification be put inside such a small space?
With UP-OCC wiring, bluetooth 4.2, and aptX set at default, you can expect good performance. If you have a Mac, you could use Bluetooth Explorer app to change the codec to a different one that suits you best!

If this supported aptX HD it would be a much more interesting proposition.
Not interesting at this price without aptxHD
No Apt-X HD???
I was so looking forward to something like this, but without aptxHD, it's a no go for me.
Wouldn't dismiss it right away. Although the codec would be nice, most users will benefit more from aptX as it is the more widely supported codec and will still sound great. Also, compared to others, we use bluetooth 4.2 for much better reliability than 4.0 and 4.1 and a larger battery so you can use for a longer period of time without charging!
 
     Share This Post       
post-13736407
Post #17 of 76

jeffhawke

500+ Head-Fier
Joined
Feb 26, 2016
Messages
837
Reaction score
514
Location
Lugano, Switzerland
Joined
Feb 26, 2016
Location
Lugano, Switzerland
Posts
837
Likes
514
aptxHD would work with any aptx device, not the other way around though
 
     Share This Post       
post-13736505
Post #19 of 76

gr8soundz

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Jun 28, 2014
Messages
2,768
Reaction score
660
Joined
Jun 28, 2014
Posts
2,768
Likes
660
I see these more as custom cables with a built-in bluetooth receiver/amp. The biggest limitation is you can only get it terminated for the specific headphone it'll be used with.

However, spending $150+ for a bit of wireless ability but less than TOTL spec may be a hard sell.

Fact is, some of the cans listed for available termination (including the HD8XX and Utopia) are very expensive and would've been purchased for their TOTL audio quality. Hampering them with what is now a mid-level codec limits their abilities. Not to mention no specs on power output are provided so who knows if this will have enough juice to be usable with those phones?

My guess is they didn't want to delay release another 6 months to add aptx-HD or LDAC. However, in a few months many more Android phones with have (or be updated to) exactly those codecs.
 
     Share This Post       
post-13736864
Post #20 of 76

czy6412

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Nov 11, 2014
Messages
445
Reaction score
107
Joined
Nov 11, 2014
Posts
445
Likes
107
So sleeving is not available for X6 or X8?
 
     Share This Post       
post-13737058
Post #21 of 76

CalvinW

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Dec 19, 2015
Messages
442
Reaction score
170
Joined
Dec 19, 2015
Posts
442
Likes
170
Was interested then saw it was not aptX HD, I'm out
 
     Share This Post       
post-13737404
Post #22 of 76
Joined
Apr 3, 2012
Messages
1,426
Reaction score
677
Joined
Apr 3, 2012
Posts
1,426
Likes
677
aptxHD would work with any aptx device, not the other way around though
Yes, they are backwards compatible with the classic, so the module will also work with those devices.

Looks interesting. What kind of DAC and amp is used?
This is bluetooth 4.2 using CSR chip.

I see these more as custom cables with a built-in bluetooth receiver/amp. The biggest limitation is you can only get it terminated for the specific headphone it'll be used with.

However, spending $150+ for a bit of wireless ability but less than TOTL spec may be a hard sell.

Fact is, some of the cans listed for available termination (including the HD8XX and Utopia) are very expensive and would've been purchased for their TOTL audio quality. Hampering them with what is now a mid-level codec limits their abilities. Not to mention no specs on power output are provided so who knows if this will have enough juice to be usable with those phones?

My guess is they didn't want to delay release another 6 months to add aptx-HD or LDAC. However, in a few months many more Android phones with have (or be updated to) exactly those codecs.
We offer wired cables for these headphones, but the option for bluetooth is now available if a user wants the wireless experience or wants to pair with device without having to deal with terminations and customizable to users need.

Depending on source and application, driving 300ohm requires moderate to high volume level (60-75%) but may get too loud at 100%!

LDAC is proprietary to one brand and aptX HD requires new hardware (can not be upgraded by software) to support, so most currently available devices will mainly benefit from aptX, AAC, and SBC, which are the more widely supported codecs.

So sleeving is not available for X6 or X8?
Yeah, it can be done. PM or email us your specs/requests and we will figure out ways to accomplish it!
 
     Share This Post       
post-13737523
Post #23 of 76

lostman

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Sep 27, 2016
Messages
172
Reaction score
25
Joined
Sep 27, 2016
Posts
172
Likes
25
While LDAC may be proprietary it is coming to Android O. Not sure if AptX HD will. Sony is pushing LDAC quite aggressively.

In any case these cables look interesting. I'll consider getting one.
 
     Share This Post       
post-13740053
Post #24 of 76

bidn

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Aug 14, 2016
Messages
374
Reaction score
405
Location
Kingdom of the Netherlands
Joined
Aug 14, 2016
Location
Kingdom of the Netherlands
Posts
374
Likes
405
I find it a brilliant practical idea, because:
compared to Astell'n Kern's very poorly designed XB10 BT receiver:
- it is always really annoying finding a way of attaching my XB10 to my headphones, the Pulseaudio BT cable removes this annoyance
- the control buttons on the XB10 are so tiny and close to each other that they are hardly useable, the more were you are moving (the point for me of Bluetooth device is the freedom to move and do things while listening to music)
But :
How does the SQ of this cable-BT-receiver fare compared to that of the XB10?
(I tend to be skeptical that its SQ would come close to that of the XB10)
 
     Share This Post       
post-13740061
Post #25 of 76

bidn

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Aug 14, 2016
Messages
374
Reaction score
405
Location
Kingdom of the Netherlands
Joined
Aug 14, 2016
Location
Kingdom of the Netherlands
Posts
374
Likes
405
I forgot two points:

The third great thing with this device is that it also remove the annoyance of having a specific cable connecting the XB10 to your headphones, thus the hassle of trying to get rid of at least 1,2 m of unwanted cable and making sure it does 'nt get caught in things while you' re moving.

Now re. the price tag, I understand it because they are offering custom-made cable terminations to a large variety of hps.
So I can accept the price , and even more if necessary to get a high SQ ,
If the SQ is not high enough, then TOTL hps will not found better than the best bluetooth hps.
(I always buy the best bt hps, currently for me it is this Audio Technica :
https://www.head-fi.org/threads/b-w-p7-wireless-vs-audio-technica-ath-dsr9bt.843557/#post-13673495 )
 
     Share This Post       
post-13741355
Post #27 of 76

Ynot1

500+ Head-Fier
Joined
Jun 29, 2017
Messages
596
Reaction score
110
Location
USA, Cook County
Joined
Jun 29, 2017
Location
USA, Cook County
Posts
596
Likes
110
With aptxhd aside I would imagine most cable form factor device are limited by the amp stage, and then by the dac stage. After all that has been fully maximized for performance would you even consider aptxhd upgrade. I would think audiotechnica's dac bypass would be beneficial in this type of application where real estate is premium. Furthermore my guess is the difference between all the dacs be it sabre, akm, ti, the sound characteristics can be licensed and distributed by the respective companies in the form of fir coefficients. This way the consumer wins and the companies still can profit from license royalties. But I maybe over simplifying a bit.
 
     Share This Post       
post-13749414
Post #28 of 76

BubbaJay

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Jun 13, 2017
Messages
384
Reaction score
311
Location
Tulsa, OK
Joined
Jun 13, 2017
Location
Tulsa, OK
Posts
384
Likes
311
Even though it doesn't have Apt-X HD I think I still might give it a shot, though I will wait to see some more reviews and impressions of it first.
 
     Share This Post       
post-13749494
Post #29 of 76

bidn

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Aug 14, 2016
Messages
374
Reaction score
405
Location
Kingdom of the Netherlands
Joined
Aug 14, 2016
Location
Kingdom of the Netherlands
Posts
374
Likes
405
Even though it doesn't have Apt-X HD I think I still might give it a shot, though I will wait to see some more reviews and impressions of it first.
Personally I wouldn't care about aptX HD,
because I think it became outdated when Sony made LDAC open-source and had it included in the current Android 8.0 Oreo (and future versions of Android).
So what will really matter for me is that forthcoming bluetooth headphones (not only Sony's ) have LDAC.
(I yet have to buy a new smartphone with Android 8, I intend to buy the Galaxy Note 8, but it hasn't received yet the upgrade for Android 8, so I'm not in a hurry...).
 
     Share This Post       

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top