mail4u
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2001
- Posts
- 144
- Likes
- 10
I agree with 95% of the review and would like to add my impressions after listening them:
1) To my ears there's a bit of a frequency elevation in the 3k - 4k region which gives a hardness. Most noticeable with the piano. I believe quite a bit of the perceived clarity is due to this rise.
2) The headband has no padding - just plastic. Can be annoying if the band doesn't sit right on your head. Need to put some foam pads on it. The kind bicycle helmets have would do.
All in all comfort is quite good. Better than the Grado SR 60 and the Labtec 835. Actually prefer wearing them to the Koss KCS 35.
3) Because the bass and treble are prominent the midrange is distant but clear. However, this is not a bad thing with these phones. It gives a spaciousness with vocals seeming to be in the distance on some CDs. Instrument placements are clear and distinct. The spatial separation is quiting appealing. Although, it probably doesn't represent anywhere near the reality of the recording which the engineers intended.
4) Compared to the Koss KCS 35s I would say the 35s are more accurate and balanced in frequency response. The Phillips have a bigger soundstage but have a lower treble rise which may make them fatiguing over long periods of time.
The Phillips midrange by itself is exceptional. If you watch TV or listening to radio with phones these have a clarity with speech that will be immediately noticable and appreciated.
Not the end all and be all of headphones but it's unique sound characteristics will be very appealing to some. Wouldn't give a blanket recommendation as I would for the Koss KCS 35s but would definitely say they should be auditioned.
1) To my ears there's a bit of a frequency elevation in the 3k - 4k region which gives a hardness. Most noticeable with the piano. I believe quite a bit of the perceived clarity is due to this rise.
2) The headband has no padding - just plastic. Can be annoying if the band doesn't sit right on your head. Need to put some foam pads on it. The kind bicycle helmets have would do.
All in all comfort is quite good. Better than the Grado SR 60 and the Labtec 835. Actually prefer wearing them to the Koss KCS 35.
3) Because the bass and treble are prominent the midrange is distant but clear. However, this is not a bad thing with these phones. It gives a spaciousness with vocals seeming to be in the distance on some CDs. Instrument placements are clear and distinct. The spatial separation is quiting appealing. Although, it probably doesn't represent anywhere near the reality of the recording which the engineers intended.
4) Compared to the Koss KCS 35s I would say the 35s are more accurate and balanced in frequency response. The Phillips have a bigger soundstage but have a lower treble rise which may make them fatiguing over long periods of time.
The Phillips midrange by itself is exceptional. If you watch TV or listening to radio with phones these have a clarity with speech that will be immediately noticable and appreciated.
Not the end all and be all of headphones but it's unique sound characteristics will be very appealing to some. Wouldn't give a blanket recommendation as I would for the Koss KCS 35s but would definitely say they should be auditioned.