DairyProduce
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2011
- Posts
- 475
- Likes
- 21
Not a whole lot, but that is dodging the point that 10KHz rolloff is unacceptable, especially for a $1099 flagship headphone. Those frequencies are important for adding realism to the recording.
The Oppo PM-1 may not actually sound like that though, we'll have to wait for subjective reviews for more consensus.
I would be nice to have a headphone pair that could truly scan the full audible range (20 - 20Khz) in a flat fashion but the truth of the matter is, the material being used in the headphone transducer and how flexible it becomes under high frequencies prevent that to happen, you have to imagine a semi flexible membrane vibrating at the frequency producing sound pressure that creates the equivalent of a 10,000 vibrations per second sound, that is real fast and most likely traveling at a very short displacement distance, not like a lower frequency sound having a wider vibrating range. The issue that most headphone manufacturers are facing is too large of a transducer creates distortion at high frequencies. What we mostly hear from the lush cymbals sound which degenerates quite nicely are actually the harmonics and overtones giving it a rich complex treble sound. It's a compromise between using commonly available material and pushing the headphones towards distortion.
I'm no expert in reading frequency graphs but it looks like the roll off happens after 15kHz, compared to the other flagship headphones. Again, it looks pretty low for the 17-18kHz region, next to the other two, but that's pretty high in the frequency range. Frequency response graphs are not linear in the x axis. Note how much space is dedicated on the graph for the 1-2kHz and then less for the 2-5kHz region. Then it starts compressing more from 5-10kHz and finally 10-20kHz the graph gets very compressed.
That's what I see anyway. Looks awesome to me for way less money than the others.
Here is the graph comparing PM-1 (blue) with the LCD-X and the HE-6 from about.stereos
The graph is logarithmic ..
I'm no expert in reading frequency graphs but it looks like the roll off happens after 15kHz, compared to the other flagship headphones. Again, it looks pretty low for the 17-18kHz region, next to the other two, but that's pretty high in the frequency range. Frequency response graphs are not linear in the x axis. Note how much space is dedicated on the graph for the 1-2kHz and then less for the 2-5kHz region. Then it starts compressing more from 5-10kHz and finally 10-20kHz the graph gets very compressed.
That's what I see anyway. Looks awesome to me for way less money than the others.
Here is the graph comparing PM-1 (blue) with the LCD-X and the HE-6 from about.stereos
It's starting at around 10khz, a little dip for a few khzs then a bump close to 15khz to finish down the curve. It's not a true pass band filter but the PM-1 is really getting close to it with the least bass line clip.
Here is the HD800 which has a reputation of having a 0-50khz range. A major dip at 10khz and then trying to get back but still staying underneath the 0 db line for the balance. The bump at around 8khz is apparently to give it a speaker sound response (most of them do).
Or better yet, objective review. People other than the testers, those who bought the headphone for their money.
No offense meant.
Headroom measurement has a different methodology than the source for the PM1, as such they are utterly and completely non-comparable. Heck even if the methods are identical (which they aren't in this case) environmental and personal differences in setting things up will still account for wild differences.
This is a very crucial rule for analyzing any measurement, is that you simply don't cross plots from different sources.
Be my guess if you can find better measurements and graphs by all means attach them to your response. As far as what I saw, it's an approximation and it does not change the results, they all clip at a specific frequency values and there is no measurements that is going to change that.
Or better yet, objective review. People other than the testers, those who bought the headphone for their money.
No offense meant.