phiemon
Headphoneus Supremus
Yes - except for this point: "And although both IEMs have significant sub-bass presence, the Ronin hits harder and with more substance." Ronin has very little sub-bass unfortunately and certainly less than Viking Ragnar.https://majorhifi.com/noble-audio-ronin-vs-viking-ragnar-review/
I only own Ragnar.........and so I wanted to know if this comparison between Ronin and Ragnar is reliable. Thank you
And this: „the Viking Ragnar reveals less separation in singular instruments, especially in the low mids.“ Never, it’s exactly the opposite! Viking Ragnar is best in class here, maybe even better than Traillii?
Moreover, the soundstage of Ronin - with the right cable - is really very good: quite holographic, wide, deep, high...
The problem is Ronin's stock cable vs Viking Ragnar's Magnus 4w.
Sorry Noble but for me a high-end IEM certainly deserves an appropriate cable (see Viking Ragnar) and not something like this comparatively poor-sounding. Hey, but it looks good!
Last edited: