sTaTIx
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2002
- Posts
- 404
- Likes
- 12
I know the premise of the leather is not sonic benefit, so it must be aiming for an aesthetic/materialistic appeal... and it fails miserably. This is one ugly-ass headphone.
Originally posted by raif yah... but usually your are paying for sound quality, not leather. |
Be able to express without the ‚_ ‚Ü to sound, the fact that also large volume covers with room has been shown. |
Originally posted by Uncledan What is the point to add leather on headphone, does it sound better? For $1800 (which is double the price of W2002), I HOPE it sound great!!! |
AT must be hoping that baseball fans are also into hi-fi audio or something. |
Originally posted by Rizumu AT must be hoping that baseball fans are also into hi-fi audio or something. |
Originally posted by mjg i think if u did buy them u should buy them for now, consmumer electronis are a horrible investment. Not always do they go up in value... |
Originally posted by doobooloo Not only that, like Tomcat pointed out, who knows if leather has some very desirable sonic effects such as vibration control...? |
Originally posted by bangraman Go to A-T's website and compare the gold in the W1000 against the close up picture I dropped in this thread. You'll find that the real article is more golden. I'm thinking that the leather will look a whole lot nicer in the flesh. |
Sonus Faber uses leather clad loudspeaker fronts, for example. |