tupac0306
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- May 11, 2011
- Posts
- 2,141
- Likes
- 382
Right, and one man's "shimmer" is another man's "sibilance."
Actually Roxanne is sibilant because of lacking of shimmer.
Right, and one man's "shimmer" is another man's "sibilance."
Actually Roxanne is sibilant because of lacking of shimmer.
Sound signature-wise, Roxanne=jh13=jh16.
The minute you put on Roxanne you know you are listening to a jh product.
Actually Roxanne is sibilant because of lacking of shimmer.
Andrew Regan reacting to Mimouille email to Angie.
I couldn't resist, I tried.... really
Sorry for your troubles, hope everyone here gets what they paid their good money for!
I don't know why you say they have the same sound signature. I have not heard of JH13 but Roxanne and JH16 is not the same. The variable bass on Roxanne is enough to change the signature. JH16 is most likely a U shape singnature. As for Roxanne you can make it mid-centric with the bass turned all the way down.
I think most of the confusion/discrepancies with impressions so far is because of a mix of Universal and Customs impressions. I'm pretty sure majority of the impressions were on Universals or demo version with a tip. The tip in itself is a huge influence in changing the SQ. It's almost impossible to get a consistent SQ with a universal.
I feel like if we run a survey, those who like the Roxanne are mostly using a custom version and those who didn't like it most like use a universal/demo version.
Not sure I follow this reasoning... but by how I personally hear sibilance, this is one of the least sibilant hi-fi devices I've ever heard. I can push these to what must be dangerous levels and listen for hours w/ nary a wince. I get the lack of shimmer comment though.
And JH yet again proving their complete absence of respect for their clients / control over the process: they have delayed yet again for the millionth time. I do not know about SQ yet, but I can tell you something, Roxannes are REALLY BAD FOR YOUR STRESS LEVELS.
Here is my reaction:
Me:
Dear Angie,
I have asked repeatedly for an update on my order (now 7 months in) and have had no answer. Could you please let me know what is going on?
Regards,
Michael
Angie (answering after my third try, and after she committed a month before to ship at the end of May)
Your order has just finished the carbon fiber shell process and is now in the lab getting the components added and the finishing touches. It should only be a few more weeks.
Thanks,
Angie
Me (not in a good mood)
What !??? Are you kidding me !!??? IT SHOULD A FEW MORE WEEKS !??? You said end of May, and now at least end of June (if you actually deliver, and apparently you have no idea what is going on). So it will have been at least 7 months, and you are still delaying.
Now that really does it. I will tell you my honest opinion, and I am trying hard to be polite:
- You have committed to something you had NO IDEA how to deliver in a reasonable delay, but yet you still took my 1.5K$ without a thought
- All ensuing communications on the matter have been DISASTROUS:
- Email answered once every three email
- Many clumsy copy + paste used to answer emails
- No clear communication on what is going on, no grasp of the situation
- Complete lack of honesty on the delays
I own / have owned close to 10 high end CIEMS / iems and as many high end DAPs, and this Roxanne business is BY FAR MY WORST CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE in the audiophile world.
Bar that, I manage a company of 50 people, and this is one of the worst interactions I have ever had in terms of transparency / honestly / process, including with clients / suppliers / employees !
The strict minimum in terms of RESPECT FOR YOU CUSTOMERS would have been to communicate clearly on the situation, both on the blogs (headfi mostly) and directly by email.
I hope I will FINALLY GET WHAT I PAID FOR SOON.
Michael