[pandareds]

I will mainly use it for listening to music and studio music recording (Not as important)


So far I've looked at:

1. Philips SHP8500

2. Sony MDR-XD200

3. Sennheiser HD 202

4. Philips SHP2500
   
    

 
But after reading a few reviews, all of them have at least one flaw; whether its durability or sound quality


Could anyone point me towards what to get? or maybe even suggest another pair of headphones other than the ones I listed?

Again, I'm looking for headphones from $30 to $65.

Thanks
 

 

[Tacoboy]

JVC HA-RX700s
JVC HA-RX900s

 

[murfhom]

Quote:

JVC HA-RX700s
JVC HA-RX900s

  what  do  you  think  about  sony  MDR  V300  ?
 
  I'm  looking  for  headphones  around  30  -  40  $ 

 

[pandareds]

What's the difference between the two models?

Also, I heard JVCs aren't durable. Are they as reliable (durability and sound quality) as sony and koss?

 

[pandareds]

Yeah, those were another pair I was looking at.

There are just so many in that price range that look mediocre.

I wish an expert would just point to me to the best one at that price range.

 

[Digital-Pride]

I would lean more towards the HD202.

 

[Tacoboy]

Not too many "experts" are going to spend time using/reviewing $30-$40 (full size) headphones.
But the JVC RX700s seem to be the best bang for the buck headphones.
I would assume at this price range durability is the same for most brands.
I almost bought the Philips 8500s, but decided to spend $125 for the Audio Technica ATH-AD700
I still own the Philips SHP2500s, 20' cord and built in volume control,
good value at $20 mail order.
 

 

[pandareds]

Would you choose the JVC RX700 over the Phillips SHP2500s?

And is JVC a good brand? I've always thought they were the lower quality ones. I have no idea though...j/w
 
Quote:

Not too many "experts" are going to spend time using/reviewing $30-$40 (full size) headphones.
But the JVC RX700s seem to be the best bang for the buck headphones.
I would assume at this price range durability is the same for most brands.
I almost bought the Philips 8500s, but decided to spend $125 for the Audio Technica ATH-AD700
I still own the Philips SHP2500s,
20' and built in volume control
good value at $20 mail order.
 

 

 

[pandareds]

Any particular reason? And do you think these are any better than the JVCs recommended in the second post?
 
Quote:

I would lean more towards the HD202.

 

 

[Tacoboy]

Quote:

Would you choose the JVC RX700 over the Phillips SHP2500s?

And is JVC a good brand? I've always thought they were the lower quality ones. I have no idea though...j/w
 


 

I would rather spend $38 for the RX700 over the $20 for the SHP2500.
I believe JVC quality is just as good as other brands.
 

 

[Digital-Pride]

JVC is a very underrated brand as they produce products that are just a good as other top manufacturers.  Here's a link to an article that takes an depth look at the HD202-http://www.headfonia.com/sennheiser-hd-202-review/

 

[pandareds]

So I just saw a youtube review of the JVC RX700. The thing is humongous. I was about to buy it, but the headphones are way too bulky. I'm looking to walk around listening to music in public.

Does anyone want to recommend different headphones?

 

[classakg]

On your price range, take a look at the Shure Srh240's. 

 

[blackzarg]

The Audio Technica ATH-M30's are also a good choice... it's about $70% the performance of the M50's. You don't get the low-low bass, or nearly as much isolation (could be a plus or a minus, depending on preference), but you also don't have to shell out $110.

 

[Katysax]

I have a pair of Sony MDR V300.  They are pretty bad.  Mid range is OK, missing lows.  A bit harsh.  I have used them for watching TV - can't stand them for music.
 
My recommendation for $30 - look for a set of refurbished Sennheiser HD 428.  There are plenty of them on Ebay for $30.  Way better than a $30 headphone.