kontai69
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2005
- Posts
- 1,009
- Likes
- 19
I did what I thought was careful A/B/A testing between the GS-1 (4 days burn in) and a 3-month old Gilmore Lite (GL) with standard (Elpac) power supply. Headphones were 4 month old Senn 650/Zu. I used the loop out of the GS-1 to feed the GL, using the same brand/model IC (Kimber PBJ). I level matched both amps to within a fraction of a decibel using pink noise and a SPL level meter. I then played very familiar CDs, often times just repeating a segment of a song over and over again and concentrating on a certain aspect (e.g. bass, cymbals, etc.). I actually drove me nuts after a while.
It is important to mention that I previously had the Dedicated Power Supply with the GL but returned it because I thought it made NO audible difference. Therefore, I did not do any GS-1 vs GL+DPS comparisons.
I can definately hear a difference between the GS-1 and the GL with stock Elpac. The GS-1 has significantly more bass than the GL, a little too much actually. It was approaching the bloaty and one-note variety. Also, to a lesser degree, the midrange is more laid back and the upper treble is slightly rolled off with the GS-1.
After 7 days of burn in, the bass is a little more subsided and articulate. The treble seems to have extended a little as well, although it is still a tad too rolled off for my liking, especially after listening to the GL. As much as I try to convince myself otherwise, at this point I actually prefer the sound of the GL a little more. It's has a slightly more "lively" and dynamic sound to me. I already sold the GL (on impulse) so there is no decision on which to keep. I hope after further listening (and burn in) that I will adapt to the sound of the GS-1 more.
The interesting thing is that when I use the GS-1 as a preamp in my speaker system, the treble is very extended, actually a little on the bright side with some recordings. Cymbals have alot of sparkle and sheen. The imaging is also more precise. This is compared to my old NAD 1600 preamp/tuner which had a really "warm," and somewhat "dull" sound. This is the primary reason why I am keeping the GS-1.
I will try different interconnects going to the GS-1 to get a little more needed treble extension. I am already using Kimber PBJ ICs and a Zu Mobius headphone cable, both which are said to be "bright" cables. I'm planning on getting some Silver Streaks, or even a used KCAG, and see what positive effects they might have on the sound. My source is a Sony DVD player feeding an Ack! dAck! v2.0 D/A converter, so I'm hoping not to get any "upgrade your source" comments.
The GS-1 also is beautiful to look at. The Gilmore Lite has excellent build quality, but the GS-1 takes it to a higher level. The faceplate is raw hand-brushed aluminum, whereas the GL's is anodized. It matches my Ack! dAck! quite well. The case also has a smoother finish. The bolts on the faceplate and top of the GS-1 are recessed into the surface, which is a really nice touch.
For kicks, here is a pic I took showing the GS-1 with the Gilmore Lite...
I can definately hear a difference between the GS-1 and the GL with stock Elpac. The GS-1 has significantly more bass than the GL, a little too much actually. It was approaching the bloaty and one-note variety. Also, to a lesser degree, the midrange is more laid back and the upper treble is slightly rolled off with the GS-1.
After 7 days of burn in, the bass is a little more subsided and articulate. The treble seems to have extended a little as well, although it is still a tad too rolled off for my liking, especially after listening to the GL. As much as I try to convince myself otherwise, at this point I actually prefer the sound of the GL a little more. It's has a slightly more "lively" and dynamic sound to me. I already sold the GL (on impulse) so there is no decision on which to keep. I hope after further listening (and burn in) that I will adapt to the sound of the GS-1 more.
The interesting thing is that when I use the GS-1 as a preamp in my speaker system, the treble is very extended, actually a little on the bright side with some recordings. Cymbals have alot of sparkle and sheen. The imaging is also more precise. This is compared to my old NAD 1600 preamp/tuner which had a really "warm," and somewhat "dull" sound. This is the primary reason why I am keeping the GS-1.
I will try different interconnects going to the GS-1 to get a little more needed treble extension. I am already using Kimber PBJ ICs and a Zu Mobius headphone cable, both which are said to be "bright" cables. I'm planning on getting some Silver Streaks, or even a used KCAG, and see what positive effects they might have on the sound. My source is a Sony DVD player feeding an Ack! dAck! v2.0 D/A converter, so I'm hoping not to get any "upgrade your source" comments.
The GS-1 also is beautiful to look at. The Gilmore Lite has excellent build quality, but the GS-1 takes it to a higher level. The faceplate is raw hand-brushed aluminum, whereas the GL's is anodized. It matches my Ack! dAck! quite well. The case also has a smoother finish. The bolts on the faceplate and top of the GS-1 are recessed into the surface, which is a really nice touch.
For kicks, here is a pic I took showing the GS-1 with the Gilmore Lite...