soundeffect
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2010
- Posts
- 1,136
- Likes
- 33
Code:
Still enjoying the Mad Dog 3.2 almost as much as when I first checked in here with my initial impressions.
"Almost" being the keyword though.I've since been running the Mad Dog on a variety of music and have discovered that it doesn't do quite as well on metal - that is, aggressive-style metal (i.e., power, thrash, or death sub-genres) combined with heavy male vocals. It seems to thin out heavy male vocals a little too much on metal-type music, which has since become very distracting. I've also found that the Mad Dog doesn't do the best job at conveying really fast speedruns either, which is also disappointing. I'm using Helloween, In Flames, Megadeth, & Machine Head as a basis here btw.
So while the Mad Dog won't be my first choice for metal, it's not that bad either though. Still does a decent job, but I'll continue to use my Audio-Technica AD2K for metal instead. The AD2K has definite legs up over the Mad Dog in the aspect of "sonic acceleration".
Oh and it's not exactly that much better for electronica than the AD2K either, unfortunately. I was hoping a closed headphone like the Mad Dog would have closed headphone-type bass, but it doesn't. Definite toss-up between the two as far as electronica & trip-hop goes. I think I'd say I enjoy the genre more on the AD2K as well. Using The Crystal Method and The Prodigy as a basis for that statement.
It's pretty much all other genres not electronic or metal where I find the Mad Dog to pull ahead over the AD2K - classical, jazz....acoustic in general.
HE-4 doesn't have the richest vocals itself though...
It is indeed better for metal and more aggressive rock genres than the MD though.
That is, assuming you have an incredibly powerful amp that can utilize the HE-4 to it's fullest. That thing ain't no joke when it comes to amping requirements. I'd say at LEAST the Lyr.
I agree with you. It's a fairly well balanced with better speed, more aggressiveness than the MD. It's just ridiculously insensitive and the hardest thing to power this side of the HE-6 and electrostatics...
As far as planar's go, I've heard mixed reviews regarding which are favorable for metal/heavy rock (including sub-genres) and music with a lot of recorded distortion. I understand and definitely agree with Clem's reasoning on the HE-4, but I've seen many times that the LCD-2 is good for these genres and a few times that the MD are as well, even favorably to some. I understand this may be because they are either more forgiving of recording quality, darker in presentation, and/or laid back and that those factors would be personal preferences. I've not heard any of those cans yet so I can't really say personally, but I'd like to gauge others comparisons who have heard the MD and other planars in these genres.
While I enjoy my HE-400 most of the time, I feel like their mid-range presentation leaves a bit to be desired for most metal/rock tracks, so I've been looking into the MD (and a few others) recently to add to my lineup. I'm not sure if the HE-4 would be too bright though, and I'm afraid of how they might present poorly recorded/mastered tracks. I certainly would be able to power them properly, so I'll reconsider them as an option - I'll have to go catch up on the HE-4 thread and hopefully I can demo these one day. The MD being closed would be icing on the cake...it's not necessary since I'm just listening in my home office, but having a well isolating full-sized can would have it's benefits from time to time.
For music that calls for forgiving treble, none is better than HE500. LCD2 has less treble quantity, but it is still a "harder" treble.
As far as planar's go, I've heard mixed reviews regarding which are favorable for metal/heavy rock (including sub-genres) and music with a lot of recorded distortion. I understand and definitely agree with Clem's reasoning on the HE-4, but I've seen many times that the LCD-2 is good for these genres and a few times that the MD are as well, even favorably to some. I understand this may be because they are either more forgiving of recording quality, darker in presentation, and/or laid back and that those factors would be personal preferences. I've not heard any of those cans yet so I can't really say personally, but I'd like to gauge others comparisons who have heard the MD and other planars in these genres.
Many of my harsher recordings were made very enjoyable by them