Quote:
Originally Posted by Judge Buff /img/forum/go_quote.gif
At the top of the page (last week), you also said this:
"Comfort. My ears are uncomfortable from wearing then, even a couple hours later. I tried over the ear and 'regular'. This seems to be from the housing/location and not the tips. May improve in the future" What changed?
|
I'm not sure. Maybe it was the fact that I wore them for several hours the first time, then only an hour or less after that; it could well be a time issue. While wearing them, they seem to fit well and are comfortable. It could also be that I have just adjusted - as you noticed I also said "May improve in the future". That was only my "Day one preview"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Judge Buff /img/forum/go_quote.gif
At least one of your comments about the S4s reads like a student that is trying to BS his way through an essay: "I think its relatively recent entry to the market explains some of its hype." If I were grading your paper, in the margin I'd write: "How so? What is the "hype" that you mention?" "How do you justify almost a year as 'relatively recent entry'?"
|
I don't feel I warranted that personal jab on a quick web forum comment ("your honor" was just a joke based on your username, didn't mean to insult if that is what I did). I used the term FOTM because I thought others had a similar perception of them. To that I was wrong.
As a long time lurker and member of the audio and headfi community, I've seen a general trend towards initially high reviews - I don't know why this is. Couple that with what I believe to be an under-performing headphone that receives high reviews, and is of relatively recent release, you get what I referred to as hype. The beginning of reviews that I'd seen started around August or September. If you do a title search for "Image S4" you'll see that dedicated threads peaked in October, then dropped off around the end of January. And when I differ in defining relatively recent, I must be drawing from a longer time frame. The Etymotic ER4p's have been basically unchanged since their release in 1991, and still perform favorably against other IEMs. As far as I know, the HD600 headphones go back at least to 2000. They may not be an IEM but they are still a high-performing headphone that is still in production
---
I'm not really comfortable breaking them in at higher than normal volumes, but they've had a good 80-100 hours under the procedure I described before, and I'm not noticing anything that is a definite change.
I have a first gen Zune, but don't notice a significant difference. It would seem strange that there would be less bass, as I normally get more out of it relative to my iPod touch, which I attribute to better amping. You may know more about amps than me, I'm just guessing on that one. I don't have a blackberry, and haven't tried them with my pimeta or m3 - I use IEM's as headphone for when I'm not at home.
As far as "moaning", I'm simply posting my own experiences and responding to your direct comments. I think it may help others like myself who think (or thought) that the S4's have good, solid bass - not overpowering. My finding, using the small bi-flange tips, is that these headphones have overdone the bass
---
Judge Buff, you are right. I'm as sure that we could eternally pick at the details of each others posts as I am that if either of us really wanted to, we could sit down and write something impregnable that could stand up to the others wrackful sieges... but that wouldn't get anyone anywhere.