Terdinus Asus
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2009
- Posts
- 22
- Likes
- 0
First off I do love the D2000, they have a great deal of versatility to me. While I mainly listen to orchestral music (namely soundtracks), I do love their ability to work well with rock/electronic/etc. a wide range of music in general. What I like about them is that they are one of the very few headphones I've heard that can reproduce to power and energy of the basses, cellos, and bass drums in an orchestra.
But I think it's time to spice it up. I want to have both, for when the mood pangs for different presentations of sound.
Here's the rub though: I don't want blaise.
From what I've read it seems the K70X and D2000s represent two very fundamentally different sound signatures.
I understand that, but is it because K70X are very cold/clinical/hollow/analytical with respect to the D2000s, or is it because the K70X represent an opposite end of the spectrum with the bold brilliance that the D2000s represent their end of the scale?
Does that make sense? The D2000s very boldly represent the lower end and the highs. Do the K70X very boldly represent the mids and the highs, or are they just clinical?
I've heard the HD650 are a sort of in between of the two, which is exactly why I'm not looking at them [at the moment], they appear to be brilliant in nothing specific, but wonderful overall...which I don't really care since I find music falling into the background. They just appear to be kind of like "it's there" headphones.
Here's the better headphones I have and enjoy, if it helps to gauge whether it's worth it to get the AKG K70X if it has a different enough sound signature from these:
Denon AH-D2000
Sennheiser HD25-1 II
Sennheiser MX-980
Thanks!
- Terdinus, who has come to terms that in the world of headphones amazing, powerful bass and an gloriously wide soundstage are mutually exclusive.
But I think it's time to spice it up. I want to have both, for when the mood pangs for different presentations of sound.
Here's the rub though: I don't want blaise.
From what I've read it seems the K70X and D2000s represent two very fundamentally different sound signatures.
I understand that, but is it because K70X are very cold/clinical/hollow/analytical with respect to the D2000s, or is it because the K70X represent an opposite end of the spectrum with the bold brilliance that the D2000s represent their end of the scale?
Does that make sense? The D2000s very boldly represent the lower end and the highs. Do the K70X very boldly represent the mids and the highs, or are they just clinical?
I've heard the HD650 are a sort of in between of the two, which is exactly why I'm not looking at them [at the moment], they appear to be brilliant in nothing specific, but wonderful overall...which I don't really care since I find music falling into the background. They just appear to be kind of like "it's there" headphones.
Here's the better headphones I have and enjoy, if it helps to gauge whether it's worth it to get the AKG K70X if it has a different enough sound signature from these:
Denon AH-D2000
Sennheiser HD25-1 II
Sennheiser MX-980
Thanks!
- Terdinus, who has come to terms that in the world of headphones amazing, powerful bass and an gloriously wide soundstage are mutually exclusive.