- Joined
- Aug 18, 2007
- Posts
- 17,452
- Likes
- 839
Quote:
They are 3.141592653589793 steps up from K702...
Originally Posted by FortisFlyer75 /img/forum/go_quote.gif Does anyone who has owned or own's the AKG 702's compare the SQ to the JH13's and how many steps above the 702's they actually are? I know the JH13 are meant to be more comparable in the HD800 league and will have a lot more SQ output with more detail for sure than my 702's, but it would give me a reference point knowing as i know how good i find my 702's with a Double Helix ALO SXC cable can sound through my headphone amp which for me is a notch above in detail and soundstage vs my best iem's the IE8's & the SE530's and am finding my 702's getting better still way after the burn in period for them & the cable. Just would love to know how many step's up these are above my best current setup i have and any similarities they may be with the 702's regarding signature aspect side of thing's as i find the 702's a nuetral, slightly leaning to bright side sounding can with a nice realistic bass that is not over done with a realistic overall tonal quality about it that does not make it sound like it is a superficial tyoe if sound and i find the micro detail the 702's give is at times spine tingling to say the least, so am really intersted to know how the JH13's stack up in comparison if any of you have the pleasure of owning both I am so looking forward to when i can finally pull the trigger & get the 13's sometime in 1st Q of 2010, that time is gonna drag for sure |
They are 3.141592653589793 steps up from K702...