Lunatique
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2008
- Posts
- 1,481
- Likes
- 385
anwaypasible - It's unlikely you had "comprehensive" hearing tests done, whether by a paid audiologist or at your school. Hearing test in general only tests frequency ranges most vital to understanding speech, and anything outside of that range they do not test. I've asked around trying to find one audiologist that tests the entire hearing range of 20Hz~20KHz and no one does it, at least no in the San Francisco Bay Area.
You don't have to use the HRTF or room simulation sections if you don't want to--you can simply use it as a crossfeed, and even as just a crossfeed, it is still much better than other crossfeeds out there.
Once again, you have no idea what you're talking about with Isone Pro's room simulation. Do you even know what Isone Pro is for? It's for audio professionals to be able to check their mixes in different environments and using different virtual audio reproduction devices to see how well their mixes are translating. That's what it's mainly designed for. That's why it also has cabinet simulations. This way, if an audio professional wants to check how his mix sounds in a typical sized living room while being played by a flat screen television, he simply chooses those settings and he'll hear a virtual environment/speaker that closely approximates the sonic signature of a flat screen TV's tiny speakers playing in a living room. This saves hm from having to burn a CD of his mix so he could take it to different kinds of environments that typical consumers would listen to music in.
As for the binaural stuff you're dragging into the conversation--they have nothing to do with the topic. You didn't even understand what was being discussed. And latex with micron small enough to capture bass frequencies? Do you even understand the scientific principles behind standing waves and frequency wavelengths? Do you understand anything about room acoustics and studio design/construction?
Look, it's ok to admit that you're out of your depth and you don't know what you're talking about, instead of stubbornly trying to save face and appearing even more foolish for trying.
Anyway, I've already done what I originally intended, which was to share my finding with the forum. Now that people know about Isone Pro, I'm done with this thread. You're free to not like Isone pro, but you ought to be talking about it because you truly understand what it does, instead of slagging it because of your ignorance.
You don't have to use the HRTF or room simulation sections if you don't want to--you can simply use it as a crossfeed, and even as just a crossfeed, it is still much better than other crossfeeds out there.
Once again, you have no idea what you're talking about with Isone Pro's room simulation. Do you even know what Isone Pro is for? It's for audio professionals to be able to check their mixes in different environments and using different virtual audio reproduction devices to see how well their mixes are translating. That's what it's mainly designed for. That's why it also has cabinet simulations. This way, if an audio professional wants to check how his mix sounds in a typical sized living room while being played by a flat screen television, he simply chooses those settings and he'll hear a virtual environment/speaker that closely approximates the sonic signature of a flat screen TV's tiny speakers playing in a living room. This saves hm from having to burn a CD of his mix so he could take it to different kinds of environments that typical consumers would listen to music in.
As for the binaural stuff you're dragging into the conversation--they have nothing to do with the topic. You didn't even understand what was being discussed. And latex with micron small enough to capture bass frequencies? Do you even understand the scientific principles behind standing waves and frequency wavelengths? Do you understand anything about room acoustics and studio design/construction?
Look, it's ok to admit that you're out of your depth and you don't know what you're talking about, instead of stubbornly trying to save face and appearing even more foolish for trying.
Anyway, I've already done what I originally intended, which was to share my finding with the forum. Now that people know about Isone Pro, I'm done with this thread. You're free to not like Isone pro, but you ought to be talking about it because you truly understand what it does, instead of slagging it because of your ignorance.