[tw33k2514]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Solitary1 /img/forum/go_quote.gif Works fine for me.

yeah its working fine now. but at first it was crash city

 

[NeObliviscaris]

does it still use the old dock connector so we can use our interconnects?

 

[VolkswagenFox]

Quote:

Originally Posted by FeedMeTrance /img/forum/go_quote.gif does it still use the old dock connector so we can use our interconnects?

I wouldn't see why not. Nothings on the dock connector has ever changed since the 3rd Gen iPod.

 

[urabus]

anybody w/a local apple store that actually has the 160gb pod in stock?

 

[nickknutson]

I just called my local Apple store and they don't have any of them in stock yet...by the weekend probably.

 

[Drag0n]

If they put a real EQ in that 160 gig classic, then thats the one to buy.
I cant see the 16 gig itouch thing. Yeah the screen is way cool and all,but they wasted all that sleek coolness on a 16 gig player.
Make it 160 gig and 40 hours with an EQ and id buy one at even $100 more and use that line out for an amp like the new Pico coming out! Justin hurry up!!!

 

[analogbox]

It's kinda good idea to have iPod classic and iPod touch separately, though. I would've hated it if the new iPod came out with only the touch screen interface since it'll be more complicated to play music off of it, never mind all the miss hitting of the buttons. With the current iPod I can play it w/o even looking at it. Hope they keep this line up and maybe bump up the storage on touch.

 

[Mik]

Well invisible shield didn't waste any time in releasing skins for the classic. You can order them already from their website.

 

[gnychis]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mik /img/forum/go_quote.gif Well invisible shield didn't waste any time in releasing skins for the classic. You can order them already from their website.

based on the dimensions from the ipod website, the 160gb has taken over the 5.5G 80gb shell, and the new 80gb took over the old 60gb shell... so i don't think they really have to make any size modifications to their skins, and the wheels seem to be the same size

 

[souperman]

hopefully the sound quality is better than the 5.5.

 

[monolith]

Quote:

Originally Posted by gnychis /img/forum/go_quote.gif based on the dimensions from the ipod website, the 160gb has taken over the 5.5G 80gb shell, and the new 80gb took over the old 60gb shell... so i don't think they really have to make any size modifications to their skins, and the wheels seem to be the same size

The classics seem to have a slightly curved edge on the top side though. Small difference, but enough to change things on something as tight as a BSE I should think.

 

[nickknutson]

Quote:

Originally Posted by gnychis /img/forum/go_quote.gif based on the dimensions from the ipod website, the 160gb has taken over the 5.5G 80gb shell, and the new 80gb took over the old 60gb shell... so i don't think they really have to make any size modifications to their skins, and the wheels seem to be the same size

That's not correct, both the 80gb and 160gb are skinner than the old 60gb/80gb...by atleast .20 of an inch. They're really slim.

 

[Pecker]

Ah nuts I wanted a 80GB Imod

Well I have been a Ipoo hater since the mini...

I am a convert :O

 

[KillersAreQuiet]

How "bout the new "fat person" version of the nano? It reminds me of a a giant chiclet. I know....off topic.

Now that the new iPod is a "classic", does that make the previous version's pre-classic?

 

[Brian_the_King]

Quote:

Originally Posted by KillersAreQuiet /img/forum/go_quote.gif How bout the new "fat person" version of the nano?...

lmao that's what I'm calling it now

"Fatty" was the only nickname i'd heard for it otherwise