owning both i cannot agree at all. the quality and tightness of the bass in the i3 is miles ahead of the raptgo. you can feel it reaching down your spine like a sharp sword, while raptgo is simply a muddy overblown blob without defintion. same with treble and imaging. its absolutely no comparison and i am really not an audeze fanboy. for example my old gen 1 lcd2 with the fazors right after they came out with it was nothing but a shouty mess in the upper mids, with zero soundstage plus impossible to wear for more that 20 minutes before head and neck pain kicked in. also the recent lcd5 is one comedy show in a headphone, specially compared to the okish lcd4. they must have thought for what ever reason, that soundstage isnt a thing at all, so lets skip that part. so in fact i am quite the opposite of a fanboy, but the i series is a rare marble that might have fallen out of another dimension, because otherwise i cannot get behind how out of all the manufacturers it was Audeze who figured it out. Its soundquality you wont find else where. i am listening to them with a straight cable plugged in and without any eq. in case you are curious. they have a hint of colouration in the mids as usual for Audeze, but it only sounds off, when directly compared to a headphone with proper timbre in the mids. the brain adjustes very fast and accepts the slight weirdness and you´re good to go.

Yeah, man. please ignore my foolishness from back then. I said some pretty suspect things and honestly I'm properly embarrassed at that. I was young, starting out and thought I knew stuff, I know now I don't.
I can be a man and admit this. My bad, everyone.
The Raptgo Hook X is okay, but correct it's not on the i3 level. I know better now and what to listen out for.
Respect.