Apologies for the multi-quote replies but I've been offline for a whole 24 hours
I am quiet displeased with all your negativity towards shanling.
It's not negativity towards Shanling per se, rather fair comment about a product Shanling has put out there that doesn't seem to be very well thought through, uses parts and software that's already redundant, will depreciate faster than the sum of its parts and costs more than twice what it's realistically worth (if not more). It's not a personal attack, it's critical response to the facts by a number of very experienced people who've been in this hobby for a while. The same would apply to ANY manufacturer putting out this product.
If we can't hold manufacturers to account and expect a certain standard of performance for our money then we may as well all just put on our favourite brand T-shirts and get matching pom poms.
Price is a non issue if it's competitive again'st existing systems/products but trying to check too many boxs simply for the sake of being an "all in one" doesn't always give anything a competitive edge, it simply drives up the bill of materials which translates into a higher cost
Spot on! Extension of what I replied above.
And I will soon hear it, I own M8 and its best dap ever, do M30 will be even better !
How do you figure that? The M8 already has better specs than the M30. More storage, more modern DAC. This sounds like cheerleading to me.
Problems I see:
a. That future digital modules with AK99999 Quad DAC would cost another $1500-2000... The same as a complete A&K DAP. So upgrade would be as expensive as just buying a high-end DAP.
b. What do you do with the module that came stock with the M30? Nobody would buy it used, because everyone already got it (with their M30). So basically resale value of modules is $0.
Goes to my point about value and redundancy. This product hasn't been thought through. At all. And is overpriced by a factor >2.
Based on what do you assume that you can get better desktop DAC/AMPs at far less money?
This is full fledged Desktop device, with batteries as a boost to the sound quality
Based on personal experience with high-end desktop systems that cost half of what you're asking for the M30. Look, this isn't personal. But please don't pretend you're offering better value - let alone better sound quality - at $3600 just because this pseudo desktop device runs on batteries.
I own tia fourte noir and Symbiote elite 19 and know nothing that sounds better then this setup.
Nail on head. Your IEMs are the main reason for that sound quality. Are you planning on selling your IEMs and buying over-ear headphones for the M30? Because if you're not, you're:
1. Wasting your money on a desktop device.
2. Already have TWO devices that are better suited for your IEMs (M8 and DX300).
3. Good luck finding headphones that sound better than your IEMs.
Seriously, at this point I can only assume there's another reason for your blind support for the M30 other than wishful thinking or some strange idea that this device will somehow transcend what's already being done better for less money.
More importantly, as an experienced member of this community you should be giving newcomers better advice than what you currently are.
As always, the above is my own opinion, YMMV, and my door is always open for a PM discussion if you think I'm going OT.